Wrapping Up the Health Care Journalists’ Meeting with Sebelius, Frieden, Pronovost, and Others

By Shawn Kennedy, interim editor-in-chief

So I got back from the Association of Health Care Journalists conference in Chicago and a colleague asked, “How was the meeting?” I automatically said it was “good.” But then, I started to think about why I said that and what I’d found valuable—in brief, it’s networking and gaining new information.

I was looking for new information about the latest health issues—mostly about how the experts see health reform shaping up—and about any new issues or initiatives in health reporting. I attended sessions on how the new health reform legislation will affect hospitals (see my recent post on this) as well as state and local health agencies—but there were also presentations on monitoring food safety, lessons learned from H1N1, guidelines for writing about health guidelines, and patient safety advocacy; the new CDC director launched a report on state tobacco use (another post); and I watched a challenging but fascinating primer on health insurance financing from an actuary.

Some things I found worth noting:

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius saying she will not stand by while some health insurance companies attempt to deny claims and push breast cancer patients off their plans. She commented, “It will be hand-to-hand combat if they try.” (See Reuters report for full story.)

Tom Frieden (CDC director) saying that increasing tobacco taxes is the single most effective tool to reduce tobacco use. (Yet taxes in South Carolina have been seven cents since 1977!)

Aida Giachello from the Midwest Latino Health […]

2016-11-21T13:18:02-05:00April 27th, 2010|health care policy|0 Comments
Read More

Hospital Execs Assert They’re ‘Scared to Death’ by Reform Measures

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief

On Friday, at the Association of Health Care Journalists (AHCJ) meeting in Chicago, I attended a session in which a panel of hospital executives discussed how their facilities would be affected by health care reform. They weren’t really sure of anything except that they’d probably lose money.

The panel included Richard Gamelli of Stritch School of Medicine and the Loyola University Health System, Jeffrey Hillebrand from NorthShore University HealthSystem, and Jim Skogsbergh from Advocate Health Care.

Skogsbergh was the most dire: “I’m scared to death about health care reform and I’m not sure how it will all shake out. The only thing I do expect is to that I’m going to get paid a lot less.” An attendee asked if hospitals would do better now that patients they cared for as charity patients would have health insurance under the new law. Gamelli answered that that depended on the insurance. Currently, he said, his facility is only reimbursed for 90% of costs incurred by Medicaid patients and 50% of those incurred by Medicare patients.

Where’s the innovation? The session was disappointing in that it was mostly about how these megahospital systems would deal with the financial implications. It would have been interesting to have a perspective from a small community hospital. And other than a program mentioned by Hillebrand to try to reduce hospital readmissions among patients with chronic disease, there seemed to be little focus on finding new approaches to cutting costs through improving quality.

2016-11-21T13:18:03-05:00April 26th, 2010|health care policy|0 Comments
Read More

Nurses Doing Primary Care, Hospital-Acquired Infections, Questionable Celebrity Advice, and Tort Reform

With a looming shortage of primary care doctors, 28 states are considering expanding the authority of nurse practitioners. These nurses with advanced degrees want the right to practice without a doctor’s watchful eye and to prescribe narcotics. And if they hold a doctorate, they want to be called “Doctor.”

That’s the start of an MSNBC story called “Doc Deficit? Nurses Role May Grow in 28 States.” Much of the article is about nurse practitioners (NPs)–and the different ways they are (or are not) allowed to practice in different states, as well as the ongoing efforts of physician groups to limit their practice (even as the health care overhaul increases the demand for primary care physicians and invests in nurse-managed clinics). We’ve posted on scope of practice issues here more than once—what’s your take as nurses, or patients?

HAIs persist. Also today, as described from a number of perspectives in a collection of articles on Kaiser Health News, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a report stating that the rate of hospital-acquired infections did not improve in 2009, despite ongoing attention to this issue in studies, IHI initiatives, nursing journals, and nearly everywhere else. What gives?

Does getting sick make you an expert? Elsewhere, at Covering Health (the blog of the Association of Health Care Journalists), Andrew Van Dam is critical of tennis star Martina Navratilova’s public advocacy for yearly mammograms for women over 40.

In February, Martina […]

2016-11-21T13:18:11-05:00April 14th, 2010|health care policy|0 Comments
Read More

‘What’s Not to Like?’ A British Nurse, Recently Treated for Cancer, Weighs In on U.S. Health Reform

Here’s a little perspective on health care reform in the U.S. from AJN’s contributing editor on international health. Jane Salvage, RGN, BA, MSc, HonLLD, FQNI, is a visiting professor at the Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College, London, and recently spent a year on the Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery.

Just two weeks ago I learned I had a stage 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma—a cancer in the lining of my womb. In many other countries today, and in the UK until recent years, this would eventually have killed me. But here I am today, happily home after a hysterectomy, probably cancer-free, thanking my lucky stars and our British National Heath Service (NHS).

My life has been saved by an army of people, from nurses and doctors to lab assistants, many of whom I’ll never meet. All my high quality care was free at the point of delivery, efficiently funded from my taxes instead of boosting the profits of insurance officials or millionaire surgeons. And I am pleased that my taxes have also subsidized the care of the demented, impoverished old lady in a nearby bed, even though her hollering and howling kept us awake most of the night.

What’s not to like? A great deal, you’d think from the nonsense talked about our UK NHS during your U.S. health reform debates. Last September, visiting the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, I stayed at the same […]

2018-03-27T16:36:45-04:00March 26th, 2010|health care policy, nursing perspective|8 Comments
Read More

Will Anyone Miss Accidents As ‘Preexisting Conditions’ and Other Insurance Doubletalk?

By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief

It’s interesting to have a firsthand encounter pertinent to the HCR story that is consuming the headlines. Recently, my son had a fall and dislocated his shoulder. He knew what had happened because he did it as a freshman in high school, some 10 years ago while playing sports. So he went to an ER and had the shoulder popped back in, saw an orthopedist as recommended, and went for physical therapy—all covered by his insurance plan. But all his claims for reimbursement were denied. The reason the company gave: his dislocated shoulder was considered a ‘preexisting condition.’

After my husband peeled me off the ceiling, we approached this methodically—we gathered forms, wrote letters, requested letters from the hospital, the orthopedist, the physical therapists—and appealed the ruling. After a bit, we received a response saying that they’d reconsidered and would cover the injury according to policy.

This is not a terribly compelling or poignant case, but it’s an example of the “first deny all claims” approach of some companies. Yes, it was resolved on appeal fairly easily, but why did it need appealing in the first place? I can’t imagine what patients and families with chronic illness must go through in trying to get treatment covered.

If the only thing health reform does is to eliminate the unjust use of preexisting conditions to deny coverage, it will get rid of one of the most critical obstacles to access to care.

2016-11-21T13:18:41-05:00March 22nd, 2010|health care policy, Patients|5 Comments
Read More

Comment ground rules

1. Please be respectful.
2. We moderate all comments.

Content disclaimer

Views expressed on the blog are solely those of the authors or persons quoted. They do not necessarily reflect AJN’s views or those of Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Go to Top