Posts Tagged ‘nursing research’

h1

If You Think ‘Evidence-Based Practice’ Is Just Another Buzzword, Think Again

November 24, 2009

Do you ever wonder why nurses engage in practices that aren’t supported by evidence, while not implementing practices substantiated by a lot of evidence? In the past, nurses changed hospitalized patients’ IV dressings daily, even though no solid evidence supported this practice. When clinical trials finally explored how often to change IV dressings, results indicated that daily changes led to higher rates of phlebitis than did less frequent changes. In many hospital EDs across the country, children with asthma are treated with albuterol delivered with a nebulizer, even though substantial evidence shows that when albuterol is delivered with a metered-dose inhaler plus a spacer, children spend less time in the ED and have fewer adverse effects. Nurses even disrupt patients’ sleep, which is important for restorative healing, to document blood pressure and pulse rate because it’s hospital policy to take vital signs every two or four hours, even though no evidence supports that doing so improves the identification of potential complications.

So begins an article in the November issue of AJN, the first in a new series we are running to highlight the way’s evidence-based practice (EBP) changes what nurses do at the bedside—and saves lives. The authors point out that every day nurses perform dozens of actions and procedures without ever really asking whether the way they are doing them is the best way, or whether or not they are even helping patients by performing these actions.

While it’s true that no one will ever get anything done if it’s not possible to take certain basics of patient care on faith, it’s also true that much of what gets done is simply not supported by the available research. EBP is not just another buzzword useful for administrators who want to sound up-to-date and want to harass you with in-service training; EBP is quickly being acknowledged as the force that will drive meaningful health care reform, simultaneously improving patient care as it lowers costs. The authors have this to say:

The Institute of Medicine has set a goal that by 2020, 90% of all health care decisions in the United States will be evidence based, but the majority of nurses are still not consistently implementing EBP [evidence-based practie] in their clinical settings.

You can read the article here. But tell us: what practices, minor or major, are you unsure about when it comes to their cost or their true efficacy? And is your hospital applying EBP to change any of these practices? Are you?

Bookmark and Share

h1

Nurses Write, Right?

November 2, 2009

By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief

WRITE

by karindalziel/ via Flickr Creative Commons

As nurses, we have great stories and insight. We see a side of life few other people see. We see people when they’re sick and tired and defeated by illness. We witness the intimacy of people when they’re most vulnerable, when all pretense has been stripped away. We also have a wealth of scientific knowledge about the effects of illness, how to prevent it and manage it, and what it takes to restore individuals to health or at least to the optimum health possible for them.

As an editor, I’m constantly seeking manuscripts. And I mean constantly—I sometimes feel like a beggar, asking people to “please write that as a case study,” or “please submit that (poignant, funny, revealing, uplifting) story,” or “consider doing an update on (name the problem) incorporating new evidence.” Maybe one out of four pieces materializes.

Nurses writing about nursing is vital to the profession. And it’s not just about writing about research. Research advances knowledge but we also need to know how practitioners are applying knowledge. We know “one size does not fit all”—how does practice need to change to meet the needs of diverse groups? What are the problems and issues aound practice? Is the nursing taught in the classroom connected to the nursing we actually do?

We need to document what we do, why we do it, and what are the outcomes. We need to do this not only to share information that can be helpful to colleagues, but also to share it with the wider health care community and the public. How else can other professions and the public know what we do and why it’s important?  

So think about what you have to say about what you do, what you’ve experienced, and what you know that would benefit your colleagues. And then write about it. We consider many types of articles, from research to opinion pieces to case studies to accounts of personal experiences. AJN’s author guidelines are at www.editorialmanager.com/ajn.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Genomics, Technology, and Nursing: A “Focus on the Whole Person”

October 21, 2009
UK National DNA Infographic/ by blprnt_van, via Flickr Creative Commons

UK National DNA Infographic/ by blprnt_van, via Flickr Creative Commons

By Diana J. Mason, PhD, RN, editor-in-chief emeritus. Mason often writes for this blog about policy and research issues.

Last week, I attended the annual conference of CANS, the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science, the “research-facilitation arm” of the American Academy of Nursing. The title of the conference was “Technology, Genetics and Beyond: Research Methodologies of the Future.” 

‘Genomics’ vs. ‘genetics.’ I’m not a genomics researcher but I found the sessions enlightening in two ways. First, I admit to struggling with the terminology (and jargon) of the field. I was reminded today that the correct term for the field is “genomics,” since “genetics” refers to the study of single genes and thus limits the focus of study mostly to rare diseases.  Genomics looks at associations among genes in the whole person—a shift in perspective that was enabled by the mapping of the human genome.

Targeted interventions. The second enlightenment came from keynote speaker and senior nurse researcher Christine Miaskowski, a dean and a professor of physiological nursing at the University of California at San Francisco School of Nursing. She noted that this shift to a focus on the whole person is what makes nurses and nursing research essential to the field.  She gave an example from her own research looking at fatigue among people with cancer. When all patients are grouped together, it looks as if there is little variation across time. But when you diagram each patient’s changes in levels of fatigue, there is actually huge variation. By looking at the genetic composition of individual patients, she’s been able  to determine who might respond best to a specific intervention that appears to have no effect when all patients are considered together. Such close examination of patient characteristics can help nurses and other health care providers to better tailor their interventions for the individual patient.

Ethical issues in research. That said, Suzanne Feetham, a nurse who has been a leader in advancing health care professionals’ understanding of genetics and genomics, talked about the ethical issues involved in conducting such research. Read the rest of this entry ?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 291 other followers