By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief
This week, The New York Times published an article about a young palliative care specialist who, when advised her cancer had progressed to the point where she should consider palliative care, rejected the notion and proceeded to pursue all available options. She was only 40 years old and said she was not ready to die. While the aggressive treatments (which she had plenty of money to pursue) gave her about another year, the article explains that her final days were spent heavily medicated for pain from the tumors throughout her body—even as she continued to request brutally painful procedures with little chance of prolonging her life.
That was her choice, and she knew what she was choosing. But that doesn’t always happen; too often, people really don’t know what it may cost them to take a stand against the inevitable. (For an engaging and comprehensive look at the issue and its implications for nurses, see Life Support Interventions at the End of Life: Unintended Consequences in the January issue of AJN.)
This month, AJN’s Reflections essay describes a scenario when full disclosure of the likely results of pursuing treatment wasn’t forthcoming from health providers. It tells of one nurse’s dilemma in balancing her role as family member and as a nurse during the last days of her mother-in-law’s terminal illness. At issue is how to explain to family members, who are “misinterpreting survival as recovery,” the likely outcome of aggressive treatments.
This piece struck home for me. As a chemotherapy nurse, all too often I witnessed patients with end-stage cancer wanting to undergo treatment that might promise, at most, a few additional months of life—but certainly not the life they’d had or wanted. Read the rest of this entry ?