Posts Tagged ‘evidence-based’

h1

Essential Nursing Resources: A Crucial Tool for Nurses Seeking Information on the Web

April 10, 2012

This nursing resource will help you find anything you need to know

By Maureen Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

Back in the dark ages, before the Web, when I was in school and researching a topic, I would go to the university library (in Manhattan, this meant a subway ride to the main campus), fill out a form, and hand it to the librarian. After a couple of hours, I’d check back and the librarian would have pulled up to eight “on-reserve” books (no more were allowed until these were returned) from the stacks and have them waiting for me. This cycle would repeat itself several times, and sometimes I’d have to wait for an “ILL”—an interlibrary loan. Of course, if I procrastinated, the material I wanted might already have been taken out by other students and I’d be out of luck, facing a deadline with no source material.

Of course, it’s all different now with the Web. This week, even the venerable Encyclopedia Britannica announced it is ceasing print production after almost 250 years and will only be available in digital format.

Now, researchers and students have virtually every article published available to them via the Internet. For nurses, there’s something called Essential Nursing Resources (pdf), an annotated listing of resources for nursing published by the Interagency Council on Information Resources in Nursing (ICIRN). 

Virginia Henderson

Founded in 1960 (here’s a brief history) by librarian and nursing organizations, including representatives from the Medical Library Association, the National Library of Medicine, the American Nurses Association, the National League for Nursing, and others (Virginia Henderson was one of the founders), it worked to organize and index the nursing literature.

The 26th edition of Essential Nursing Resources (updates happen biennially) is “a resource for locating nursing information and for collection development.” It lists ”print, electronic, and web sources to support nursing practice, education, administration, and research activities,” plus other information to guide the user when pursuing nursing topics on the Web, like articles on signing up for RSS feeds, a list of nursing blogs of note (this blog is included!), and more.

This isn’t just a resource—it’s a truly essential stop for finding nursing content and Web resources, a gift from some forward-looking people back in 1960.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Confused About the Charge Nurse Role? You’re Not Alone

February 3, 2011

Charge nurses—as is often the case, there’s the ideal and the reality. Consider a recent blog post at the nursing blog At Your Cervix, which expresses some honest reservations about acting as a charge nurse—both about the challenges involved, and the lack of compensation for the added duties. Here’s an excerpt:

I’m really not so sure about this charge nurse thing. I was told when I arrived on a recent shift that I was to be in charge. I think I’ve done charge (maybe?) three times. Those times were only because there was no one available who did charge, and I was the most likely choice to do it. I haven’t been trained or oriented to do charge. It was kind of a “toss her in there and do it” situation.

If you read the entire post, you’ll learn that this blogger isn’t so sure she wants to take this role on again anytime soon. As it happens, AJN published a CE article back in September of last year (our clinical editor, Christine Moffa, wrote this post about it at the time) on an initiative which took place at the highly respected New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. Its goal was to figure out this charge nurse thing in a more systematic and sensible way.

Like so many roles in so many professions, there may be multiple versions of the same job, depending on where you work. This can be a good thing, since complex work within a complex system is difficult to reproduce by formula (hence the limitations of certain uses of “workflow mapping” done by outside consultants), but it can also be a huge problem, as the facts noted by this blogger suggest.

Our September 2010 article, “An Evidence-Based Approach to Taking Charge,” is part of our Cultivating Quality series, which looks at specific evidence-based initiatives and sees how they worked. The article about charge nurses describes the role confusion and other issues the medical center hoped to address by the initiative; gives a research overview; and addresses, in particular, the selection, preparation, and duties of charge nurses. Here’s a brief excerpt:

Our medical center doesn’t have a permanent charge nurse model; rather, charge nurses are assigned on a rotating basis. Until this initiative, the role wasn’t voluntary; all staff nurses were expected to assume the position if the need arose. The majority of staff new to the charge nurse position said they didn’t have a clear understanding of the expectations for the role. Some units had their own charge nurse descriptions; other units had none. Orientation to the role was inconsistent and unstructured. The vice president of patient care services responded to these concerns and identified a project leader who coordinated a task force to determine issues and develop strategies to address them. The goals, as established by the task force, were to

* provide role clarity.

* clearly define responsibilities and core competencies.

* provide a formalized orientation.

* develop a standardized hand-off report.

Is it possible to anticipate every problem? No, probably not. But there’s a lot more that can be done to make everyone’s life easier, and the role far more helpful—and less stressful. We hope you’ll read the article, and let us know your own experiences in this role.—JM, senior editor/blog editor

Bookmark and Share

h1

When Timely Nurse Removal of Urinary Catheters Reduces UTI Rate

August 19, 2010

By Christine Moffa, MS, RN, AJN clinical editor

Ever since we started the Cultivating Quality column at AJN, manuscripts featuring evidence-based quality improvement projects have been pouring in. There is a lot of great work being done at the bedside by practicing nurses, and this column provides the opportunity to share their ideas with others.

Lancaster General's CAUTI rates, fiscal yrs 2007-2009 (click to enlarge)

This month’s Cultivating Quality installment, Reducing Rates of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, comes from Joyce Wenger, MS, RN, the infection control performance improvement coordinator at Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA. According to the CDC, urinary tract infections (UTIs) account for more than 30% of hospital-associated infections, and almost all are “caused by instrumentation of the urinary tract.” Nursing staff were able to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rates using a three-pronged approach “beginning with education, progressing to tests of new and better products, and ending with the nurse-driven protocol for catheter removal.”

That last part is my favorite. In most facilities a doctor or nurse practitioner has to write an order before a Foley catheter can be removed from a patient. Patients may end up spending several days at increased risk for UTI because of an unnecessary urinary catheter in place. This hospital came up with a plan to give nurses the autonomy to remove them—which makes sense, since they’re the ones checking the patient daily. The team at Lancaster General created the following list of criteria that patients need to meet in order to maintain a Foley catheter. If not, then the nurse can remove it.

A nurse keeps the Foley catheter in place if

  • a urologist is on the case; the catheter cannot be removed without the urologist’s approval.
  • a physician has ordered that the catheter not be removed (the medical reason to continue or criteria for removal should be documented).
  • a physician has documented “medical necessity” within the last 24 hours.
  • the patient is unresponsive or comatose.
  • the patient is receiving palliative or hospice care.
  • the patient has received IV sedation within the last 12 hours.
  • the patient has received IV inotropic agents within the last 24 hours.
  • there is an order for IV diuretics to be given every six or fewer hours.
  • the patient is undergoing ultrafiltration.
  • acute or worsening renal failure is evident (that is, there has been a creatinine level increase of 1 mg/dL or more above the admission or baseline level).
  • surgery has been performed within the last 24 hours.
  • a pressure ulcer might be soiled if the catheter is removed and the patient is incontinent.

But I’d recommend reading the entire article and seeing how these interventions compare to those at your facility. We’d love to hear what you think about it.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Interventions to Promote Physical Activity in Chronically Ill Adults: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?

July 14, 2010

By Sylvia Foley, AJN senior editor

It sounds like a no-brainer: physical activity can have great health benefits for people who are chronically ill. But which interventions promote physical activity in this population most effectively? Many studies evaluating such interventions have been conducted; but “without the benefit of a statistical analysis across studies it can be difficult to detect patterns and interpret results,” say the authors of this month’s CE feature, Todd M. Rupper and Vicki S. Conn.

In 2008 Conn and colleagues did just that, performing a meta-analysis that summarized the findings of 163 reports on 213 independent tests of interventions used to promote physical activity among more than 22,000 adults with various chronic illnesses. Now, in this article, Rupper and Conn discuss the implications of  the findings from that meta-analysis, describe the strategies and practices most commonly used, and identify which ones have proven most effective. Among the take-aways: Read the rest of this entry ?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 296 other followers