Are You Ever Justified in Deceiving a Patient?

A patient’s irrational refusal to take medication can be frustrating for the nurse. Crushing the pill into applesauce or ice cream saves time and effort, and spares the patient the aggravation of quarreling. But while hiding medication is sometimes ethically justified, often it is not.

That’s the start of the “Putting the Meds in the Applesauce,” an article (free for March) by nurse ethicist Douglas Olsen in the current issue of AJN. Olsen notes that studies suggest hiding medications in food may be a relatively common practice, considers the ethical principles at play in such a decision, and offers advice for those who may be considering it. (Added: The column chiefly concerns the nursing care of cognitively impaired patients—not those who simply don’t want medications or those with with psychiatric illnesses who may be endangering themselves or others by refusing medication.)

Says Olsen, “[t]wo factors must be considered in determining whether hiding medication is justified or not: the nurse–patient relationship and the patient’s rights.” He adds that such a decision “requires the nurse and surrogate decision maker to imagine how the patient might have reasoned: would the earlier, cognitively intact patient have agreed that, given the present impairment, the providers shouldn’t be morally bound to accept the patient’s decision to decline medication?”

Another question he suggests asking oneself is this: “could the deception survive public scrutiny, including that of professional peers?”

What’s your take? What’s your experience?—JM, senior editor

Bookmark and Share

When Being Good Means Looking Bad: An Ethical Quandary for Nurses

Performance measurement, an increasingly pervasive trend in health care, is credited with significant improvements in the quality of care . . . . Even so, this is little comfort when a nurse faces a situation where an action necessary for meeting a performance measure isn’t what she or he believes is best for a particular patient. For example, falls are often tallied as a performance measure, but frail patients need to be walked; raising the head of the bed to prevent pneumonia is often counted in performance evaluation but may result in less turning of the patient, which may mean more sacral ulcers—which may or may not be tallied as a separate performance measure.

That’s from an article in this month’s AJN by nurse ethicist Doug Olsen. It’s called “When Being Good Means Looking Bad,” and is about potential unintended effects of some well-intentioned performance measures that don’t easily allow for consideration of clinical context. Olsen writes that the nurse may, in certain situations, find herself or himself faced with three highly imperfect options to choose between:

Go to Top