By Maureen Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief
So far, so good
In June, the American Nurses Association (ANA) convened its second membership assembly, which included representatives of constituent and state nurses associations, individual members groups and affiliated entities, plus the board of directors. (This is the structure that replaced the House of Delegates as the official governing body of the ANA, when ANA restructured in 2012. See our 2012 report on the restructuring.)
The assembly was preceded by ANA’s annual Lobby Day on June 12th, in which nurses visited legislators on Capitol Hill to talk up legislation important to nursing, like bills on staffing, safe patient handling, and one that would remove barriers to efficient home care services.
This membership assembly was subdued—perhaps a gift for Karen Daley, the outgoing two-term president who shepherded the organization through a turbulent period of change. There were no contentious resolutions to deal with this time—there were only three issues brought to the group through dialogue forums, to develop recommendations for the board of directors:
- scope of practice (full practice authority for all RNs)
- integrating palliative care into health care delivery
- promoting interprofessional health care teams
While the scope of practice topic was ostensibly promoting full practice for ALL RNs, most of the discussion (and a video) focused only on APRNs as physician colleagues. I wonder: are we fostering a message in which only nurses who are APRNs are perceived as physician colleagues? Read the rest of this entry ?