Archive for the ‘nurse practitioners’ Category

h1

Emergency Contraception: Why It Matters and How Nurses Can Improve Access

April 16, 2012

By Sylvia Foley, AJN senior editor

Family planning counseling, by Dick Schmidt / Sacramento Bee / Zuma Press

Unintended pregnancy can, in some circumstances, be detrimental to the health of both the women who become pregnant and the children born as a result. And such pregnancies happen far more often than you might think, accounting for nearly half of all pregnancies in this country, with even higher rates among women ages 18 to 24 and low-income women. Yet we have had the means to safely prevent such pregnancies for decades, through emergency contraception. Why isn’t emergency contraception used more often?

That’s a question author Kit Devine explores in “The Underutilization of Emergency Contraception,” one of April’s CE features. First, Devine describes the four methods currently available: conventional oral contraceptives and the copper intrauterine device (IUD)—both are used for birth control and can also be used to prevent pregnancy after intercourse has occurred—and the agents levonorgestrel and ulipristal acetate, which are FDA-approved for emergency contraception. Effectiveness ranges from 51% to 62% (for conventional oral contraceptives) to as high as 99% (for IUDs).

Known and likely barriers to their use include Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

When Lawmakers and Physicians Hold Nurses Back

February 13, 2012

Editor’s Note: Toni Inglis, MSN, RN, CNS, FAAN, writes opinion for the Austin (TX) American-Statesman. She works at the Seton Healthcare Family in Austin as a neonatal ICU staff nurse and also writes a nursing blog for Seton and edits its monthly NursingNews. This article is a reprint of an April 22nd commentary in the Statesman. Toni was inspired to write the column after a particularly disappointing legislative session, in which Texas advanced practice nurses made fewer gains than in past sessions—despite Texas ranking last in access to health care and having the most restrictive laws in the country regarding APRN scope of practice and prescriptive authority. She believes the poor access and barriers to practice are related.

AJN finds the article particularly relevant as legislatures across the country deliberate on APRN barriers to practice. You can read her commentaries at ingliscommentary.com.

Here’s an idea that wouldn’t cost Texas a dime but would save millions of dollars every year: Remove all barriers restraining nurses from practicing to the full extent of their education and training.

by Brian Romig/via Flickr

No state needs primary care providers more than Texas, which has a severe shortage. Texas ranks last in access to health care and in the percentage of residents without health insurance. Of Texas’ 254 counties, 188 are designated by the federal government as having acute shortages of primary care physicians. Of that number, 16 counties have one and 23 have zero.

If every nurse practitioner and family doctor were deployed, we still couldn’t meet the need. Texans are desperate for health care.

Doing the math and to help meet the need, the Legislative Budget Board recommended autonomous practice of advanced practice nurses after a preceptorship.

In Texas, our legislature — session after session — keeps the most restrictive laws in the country. Nurse practitioners don’t want to perform brain surgery. They just want to provide primary care and are quick to refer cases to a doctor when necessary.

Most states with far less need do not legislate practice barriers to nurse practitioners. Given the severity of our problem, shouldn’t we at least bring ourselves in line with those other states? Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Physician-centric vs. Patient-centric?

November 16, 2011

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

Last week, we posted here a piece by AJN’s clinical managing editor Karen Roush, decrying the use of the term “physician extender.” It reminded me of a recent article from the New York Times on nurses with doctorates, which reported that if some physicians have their way and their legal strategy succeeds, they will be the only group permitted to use the honorific “doctor.”

Degrees vs. licenses. This borders on the ridiculous, as the title is an academic title that signifies achievement in a field of study; it is not a license. Doctoral degrees are awarded in just about every field of study, from astronomy to zoology. Physicians are awarded a doctor of medicine, dentists are awarded a doctor of dental science, and so it goes. In health care, there are dentists, psychologists, social workers, physical therapists, pharmacists, and yes, nurses too, with doctoral degrees. Nurses have been earning PhDs and EdDs (doctorates in education) and the DNSc (doctorate in nursing science) for years, and now there’s a new nursing doctorate degree—a DNP, doctor of nursing practice—that’s specific to nurses in clinical practice. They are still licensed as nurses, as that’s what they are.

This parochial thinking is held by those physicians (not all, but far too many) who still adhere to the traditional view that they, and they alone, know what’s best for patients and for health care; they’re in favor of teamwork, but only as long as the team recognizes that they are the leaders and decision makers.

Both the media and the health care system bear some responsibility for this. The system itself is physician-centric rather than patient-centric—hospital policies, practitioner admitting privileges, purchasing (especially in the OR), and scheduling have often developed around physician preferences; reimbursements almost always must go through physicians, whether or not they’re actually involved in the delivery of care.

Most media portrayals, both fiction and documentary, focus on physicians as the only important providers in health care, relegating other health professionals to low-level supporting roles (or, as Roush noted,“extensions” of physicians). Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Military Metaphors, Unnecessary Admissions, New Blogs, Keeping Secrets

September 29, 2011

It’s a common scenario: a 90-year-old resident of a U.S. nursing home — call her Ms. B. — has moderately advanced Alzheimer’s disease, congestive heart failure with severe left-ventricular dysfunction, and chronic pain from degenerative joint disease. She develops a nonproductive cough and a fever of 100.4°F. The night nurse calls an on-call physician who is unfamiliar with Ms. B. Told that she has a cough and fever, the physician says to send her to the emergency room, where she’s found to have normal vital signs except for the low-grade fever, a normal basic-chemistry panel and white-cell count, but a possible infiltrate on chest x-ray. She is admitted to the hospital and treated with intravenous fluids and antibiotics. During her second night in the hospital, Ms. B. becomes confused and agitated, climbs out of bed, and falls, fracturing her hip. One week after admission, she is discharged back to the nursing home with coverage under the Medicare Part A benefit. The episode results in about $10,000 in Medicare expenditures, as well as discomfort and disability for Ms. B.

There is an alternative scenario, however . . .

That’s from an article in NEJM called “Reducing Unnecessary Hospitalizations of Nursing Home Residents.” In any health care system of as much complexity as ours, there’s bound to be a huge amount of waste. The article gives a good example of how the skills of NPs might be put to excellent use both saving a lot of money for Medicare and making the lives of nursing home residents a whole lot nicer. It may be cheaper, but it’s not “rationing”—it’s rational.

Now a matter of language rather than money: the Viewpoint essay by Kathleen Thies in the October issue of AJN is about the use of military language to refer to nursing staff. Here’s how it begins, and you can click the link to read the whole article, including the author’s suggestion for an alternative terminology. We’d love to know whether the author’s perspective resonates with you:

How often have you heard the term frontline staff used to refer to direct care nurses and others working at a patient’s bedside? It conjures images of the great world wars, of soldiers marching across battlefields to fight the enemy. The infantry are invariably young, dispensable, interchangeable. Commands are issued by generals and passed down through the ranks. No questions are asked.

Blog roll update: We’ve added some interesting new blogs to our blogroll (they’re not new blogs, actually, just new to our blogroll). A few of them are by MDs, such as The Carlat Psychiatry Blog and Movin’ Meat, and a couple of are by nurses, such as madness: tales of an emergency room nurse, which has a good short post about why it doesn’t always help to be a nurse when your family member is in the hospital (there have been a few posts on this topic lately in different venues, I think?). Also added: The Nursing Ethics Blog, which is run by two people, a nursing professor/ethicist and a philosopher. It should be interesting to explore.

As the editor of the Reflections column (and this blog), I read hundreds of submissions each year about dying patients, with a subgenre of submissions devoted to dying infants or miscarriages. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Memorial Day Weekend Notes from the Nursosphere Blog Roundup

May 27, 2011

As I walked into the exam room and introduced myself as a nurse practitioner, the patient announced she was “forced” to come to our clinic and “wasn’t allowed to see a real doctor” downtown. I was slightly taken aback. Here I was, running on time, in a pretty good mood and ready to assess and treat to the best of my abilities, and then WHAM. I took a deep breath and realized she wasn’t slamming NPs; she had a grudge against military providers, regardless of education background.

That’s from a recent post by a U.S. Air Force family nurse practitioner (NP) who’s been blogging from Afghanistan. She’s home now, and the post, about being discriminated against by a patient—not because she’s an NP, but because she’s a military provider—is worth noting as we prepare for another Memorial Day Weekend.

Memorial Day Flags/Eddie Coyote, via Flickr

Are you a nursing student, or just ready for a change in your nursing career? Curious about various nursing specialties and what they really involve? Codeblog has been running a helpful series of posts, each of which focuses on an interview with a particular type of nurse. The latest is with a cardiac catheterization lab nurse.

Nothing like a medication error to ruin everyone’s day. Lisa at In the Round has a useful post that lists the eight “rights” of medication administration.

“So there is very little, in the end, I won’t share. There are some things, however, that are beyond the pale. Here’s my short list of ten things I will never, ever tell you, my patient.” That’s from a recent post at Those Emergency Blues: “Don’t Tell Your Patient This. Or That.” Have a look and see if you agree.

Lastly, an article today on the NY Times “Well” blog summarizes the findings of a new report on the activity levels of Americans in the workplace. The basic idea is that we’re less active at work, and since we spend much of our time and energy at work, we’re also increasingly obese. Many nurses might dispute this finding if they spend their days on their feet. But it’s worth considering, as many of us prepare for a long holiday weekend full of opportunities to eat, relax, and also, yes, to get a bit of exercise—even if it’s only a matter of taking a daily walk after dinner in the lingering late May light. Or, as Sean at My Strong Medicine puts it, a little bluntly: “What Was Your Excuse for Not Exercising?” 

Point taken.—JM, senior editor

Bookmark and Share

h1

Saving ‘Mimi’: How Nurses Can Combat Human Trafficking in the USA

February 1, 2011

By Sylvia Foley, AJN senior editor

Never to lie . . . by flickrohit, via Flickr

Picture this: “Mimi,” an 18-year-old Brazilian girl who speaks little English, arrives in your ED with injuries sustained in a beating. She’s accompanied by an older man who refuses to leave her side and who intercepts and answers questions directed at Mimi. The ED physicians and nurses treat Mimi’s injuries and release her back to this man’s care. Maybe you feel uneasy, but what can you do? Maybe the man really is her uncle; maybe he’s just being overprotective.

In fact, Mimi is a victim of human trafficking, and the man who brought her to the hospital is both her pimp and her trafficker. And you and your colleagues just missed a chance to intervene on her behalf. Unfortunately, you’re not alone. In “The Role of the Nurse in Combating Human Trafficking,” a February CE feature, author Donna Sabella notes that clinicians who encounter victims of human trafficking often don’t realize it, and many such chances to intervene are lost. Sabella, a nursing professor active in helping such victims, hopes to change this. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

An NP Prepares: Calling All Nurse Mentors

January 7, 2011

Jen Busse, RN, MPH, is an intern at the Center for Health, Media and Policy at Hunter College in New York City and is currently pursuing her MSN as a family nurse practitioner at Columbia University. This is her second post about studying to be an NP. Her first was “An NP Prepares: When Normal is Better Than Fine.”

While we watch schools of nursing significantly increasing class sizes in a stalled economy, students are still being told that new nurses should “have no trouble” securing jobs upon graduating. Advancing our careers won’t be an issue either, we’re told.

We new nurses, in masses, are then sent out to fend for ourselves. Many schools of nursing lack career services help for students—possibly due to the myth of the “nursing shortage.”

Well, I’m here to tell you, from the evidence gathered in my own laborious, and mostly fruitless, job search, that archaic ideas about the ease of finding a position as a nurse are dead wrong. What we really want to do is to take care of patients, not spend years of our lives searching for an opportunity to do so. 

So in steps the nurse mentor—if you’re lucky.

Unfortunately, career mentorship for many new and experienced nurses is rare, creating difficulties in securing a job or advancing one’s career. Without role models, it’s difficult to feel motivated or to gain confidence in your abilities. A seasoned professional or trusted peer is crucial in providing helpful advice, guidance, and inspiration. Nurse mentors offer protégés their knowledge and wisdom, in the process creating a legacy for future generations through the creation of new nurse leaders.

I was incredibly fortunate to find two women, both important nurse leaders, Barbara Glickstein and Diana Mason (bios here). They helped to pull me out of my despair of joblessness, when I had all but abandoned my hopes of working in nursing, and have helped to guide me to what I now see as a promising future in this field. They’ve helped me build my confidence, especially through writing about health-related issues, and shown me that I do have something special to offer to the field of nursing. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

‘The Birthplace’: Showcasing a Collaborative Practice Model

December 21, 2010

By Sylvia Foley, AJN senior editor

Megan Tudryn, RN and expectant mother, undergoes a contraction. Photo by Alice E. Proujansky; all rights reserved.

Photojournalist Alice E. Proujansky reports in AJN this month on The Birthplace, a collaborative care practice model at Baystate Franklin Medical Center in Greenfield, Massachusetts, where a team of five nurse midwives, three obstetricians, and 35 nurses attend some 400 to 500 births annually. Except for preterm and other higher-risk deliveries, the nurse midwives manage all deliveries and monitor fetal and maternal health. Patients complete detailed birth plans that afford them various care options. Physicians are called in only when necessary; as one nurse midwife told the author, “There’s an awful lot that we can do on our own.”

How well does the model work? The Birthplace has lower-than-usual rates of medical interventions such as episiotomy, epidoral anesthesia, and cesarean section. The patients have greater autonomy and decision-making capabilities. And the practitioners “relish the collaborative approach,” says Proujansky, who interviewed several clinicians and patients for the article; her photographs appear alongside the text and on the December cover. Proujansky’s last piece for AJN, a photo essay on a Dominican maternity ward, appeared in our December 2008 issue; read it here.


Bookmark and Share

h1

Today’s Notes from the Nursosphere

December 7, 2010
Image of Japanese Attack - Pearl Harbor, Hawai...

Image via Wikipedia

As noted today by Joni Watson at Nursetopia, it’s Pearl Harbor Day, and nurses were (surprise) key players in that day’s awful events. Here’s how the post begins:

My heart was racing, the telephone was ringing, the chief nurse, Gertrude Arnest, was saying, “Girls, get into your uniforms at once, This is the real thing!”

Speaking of safety, “Top 10 Health Technology Hazards for 2011″ (pdf), from the ECRI Institute, gives us a list of hospital patient safety risks that, according to the authors, ”reflects our judgment about which risks should receive priority now, a judgment that is based on our review of recent recalls and other actions . . . , our analysis of information found in the literature and in the medical device reporting databases of ECRI Institute and other organizations, and our experience in investigating and consulting on device-related incidents.” These include “radiation overdose and other dose errors during radiation therapy,” “alarm hazards,” and eight others.

And now to electronic charting vs. doing it the old-fashioned way: we have a comment thread going on at AJN‘s Facebook page about whether or not EHRs save nurses time or not. Go there to comment, or leave a comment here.

Also noted: Stephen Ferrara at A Nurse Practitioner’s View wonders whether the preceptorship model is still adequate for training NPs. Or is it time for a residency model instead?

I’m not necessarily referring to the typical residency training of physicians which takes place in hospitals but a residency-type of program in an out-patient setting (ironic that we use the term residency). We realize that healthcare is not exclusively delivered in hospitals. It takes place in independent providers offices, in community health centers, in mobile health vans, and in retail settings. It takes place in people’s homes and places of employment. It takes place in many of the health decisions that we make on a daily basis. I found this NP residency program in Connecticut that claims to be the first NP residency in the US. The programs admits 4 NPs each year and trains them to handle scenarios encountered in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). The residency lasts 1 year and appears to be a wonderfully structured program and setting.

Just a few items of interest. As always, we welcome your comments.—JM, senior editor/blog editor 

Bookmark and Share

h1

An NP Prepares: When ‘Normal’ Is Better Than ‘Fine’

November 17, 2010

By Jen Busse, MPH, RN, who is currently working as a nurse while studying at Columbia University College of Nursing to be a family nurse practitioner. She’s also an intern at the Center for Health, Media and Policy at Hunter College in New York City.

As I walked toward the school of nursing’s skills laboratory, my hands were sweating and my heart pounded. Today was the day of nurse practitioner school when I would learn how to perform a pelvic exam—on a living person. What if I couldn’t find the cervix or said the wrong thing? Or, worst of all, what if I hurt someone?

I peered through the door and a group of women looked over and welcomed me in. Other students began coming into the classroom, which was set up with 10 or so exam tables surrounded by hospital curtains. We were split into groups of threes, with two instructors each: our gynecological teaching associates (GTAs), or “pelvic models.” My hands shook uncontrollably now. As an RN, I’ve had numerous experiences with patients in potentially uncomfortable situations, such as placing Foley catheters or giving complete bed baths. But this just didn’t seem the same; somehow, it’s more personal.

With two of my classmates I approached the exam table. Our two GTAs were there, one sitting and the other standing, both smiling warmly. The area was already set up, intimidating metal speculum and all. One of the GTAs skillfully walked us through the exam while the other acted as a patient. Her actions were slow and deliberate, with special attention paid to ensuring that her “patient” felt comfortable and in control of the situation. She encouraged us to “empower” the patient by having her pull back the sheet for the exam on her own and then hold a mirror to better be a part of the examination. She stressed that the places where the patients placed their feet were not stirrups, but foot rests. Read the rest of this entry ?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 296 other followers