Archive for the ‘media depictions of nursing’ Category

h1

Physician-centric vs. Patient-centric?

November 16, 2011

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

Last week, we posted here a piece by AJN’s clinical managing editor Karen Roush, decrying the use of the term “physician extender.” It reminded me of a recent article from the New York Times on nurses with doctorates, which reported that if some physicians have their way and their legal strategy succeeds, they will be the only group permitted to use the honorific “doctor.”

Degrees vs. licenses. This borders on the ridiculous, as the title is an academic title that signifies achievement in a field of study; it is not a license. Doctoral degrees are awarded in just about every field of study, from astronomy to zoology. Physicians are awarded a doctor of medicine, dentists are awarded a doctor of dental science, and so it goes. In health care, there are dentists, psychologists, social workers, physical therapists, pharmacists, and yes, nurses too, with doctoral degrees. Nurses have been earning PhDs and EdDs (doctorates in education) and the DNSc (doctorate in nursing science) for years, and now there’s a new nursing doctorate degree—a DNP, doctor of nursing practice—that’s specific to nurses in clinical practice. They are still licensed as nurses, as that’s what they are.

This parochial thinking is held by those physicians (not all, but far too many) who still adhere to the traditional view that they, and they alone, know what’s best for patients and for health care; they’re in favor of teamwork, but only as long as the team recognizes that they are the leaders and decision makers.

Both the media and the health care system bear some responsibility for this. The system itself is physician-centric rather than patient-centric—hospital policies, practitioner admitting privileges, purchasing (especially in the OR), and scheduling have often developed around physician preferences; reimbursements almost always must go through physicians, whether or not they’re actually involved in the delivery of care.

Most media portrayals, both fiction and documentary, focus on physicians as the only important providers in health care, relegating other health professionals to low-level supporting roles (or, as Roush noted,“extensions” of physicians). Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Nurse Practitioners Are Not ‘Physician Extenders’

November 11, 2011

By Karen Roush, MS, RN, FNP-C, AJN clinical managing editor

“Physician extender.” It’s way past time to kill that term.

A study published in the October issue of Surgery found that adding an NP to the surgical team decreased the number of unnecessary ED visits by 50% and increased the use of visiting nurse, physical therapy, and occupational therapy services. A Medscape article (registration required) on the study explained the importance of the findings in this way: “According to the researchers, physician ‘extenders,’ such as NPs, help maintain continuity of care while resident work hours are kept at a maximum of 80 per week. . . .”

Sure enough, the stated purpose of the study was to determine if “integrating this physician extender into the surgery team” would improve outcomes and resource allocation. Ouch.

Experts in our own right. Nurse practitioners are not physician extenders. We are highly skilled and educated nurses who provide evidence-based care grounded in the nursing model. We are not “extensions” of anyone. We are colleagues and collaborators, independent clinicians and experts in our own right. Our purpose is to provide comprehensive care, promote health, educate, and advocate. It is not to relieve interns, supplement physician education, or be the low-cost alternative when physicians have to “do more with less,” as Medscape quoted one of the study authors. Yes, we should be integrated into health care teams, surgical and otherwise—because nurses provide a distinctive aspect of care that research has repeatedly shown to be essential to good patient outcomes. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Charla Nash Fights On

June 13, 2011

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chiefThis weekend, I saw an article about Charla Nash, the Connecticut woman who was viciously attacked in February 2009 by a friend’s chimpanzee. (Click image at left for article and video at CNN.) She had suffered terrible injuries to her face and hands that left her without hands and eyes and severely disfigured. Last month, she received a face transplant at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston. She also received hand transplants, but they failed to take and were removed because of sepsis.

It’s truly a tragic story. Christine Moffa, our clinical editor at the time, wrote a few blog posts about Charla back in 2009. She’d seen Charla’s brother Steve on the The Today Show, where he’d reported that the first thing his sister had said upon waking from her coma was the name of her nurse, Lisa. As she wrote in that first post, “Steve Nash attributed her response to the nurse to the fact that the nurses had always talked to [Charla] as if she were awake.” (Subsequent posts by Christine included photos of Charla that her brother had been kind enough to share.) Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Bullying Wars: Theresa Brown vs. ‘the entire physician profession’

June 1, 2011

By Maureen Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

On May 11, an op-ed piece written by nurse and New York Times blogger Theresa Brown on bullying by physicians caused some physicians to protest (full disclosure: Brown’s honest and moving ethical meditation on a very different topic, “Right Treatment, Right Patient?”, was just published in our June issue).

Notable among her critics was Kevin Pho of the popular blog, Kevin MD, who wrote that Brown “unfairly blames doctors for hospital bullying.” He claimed that Brown uses her writing outlet to “metaphorically bully the entire physician profession.” Another commentary (by physician Ford Vox, writing in The Atlantic Monthly) accused Brown of publicly “drawing and quartering” her colleagues.

Spare me, please. Brown used a recent personal encounter to illustrate a problem that is, unfortunately, commonplace in hospitals.  She used it as a lede and parlayed the story into an insightful piece about bullying in hospitals.  (From experiences I had and witnessed during my clinical years, I actually thought it was a fairly mild example.) Ironically, the strong language used to counter Brown’s commentary made it seem that physicians were trying to bully Brown into silence because she’d spoken out. As if to say: how dare a nurse challenge physician behavior?  Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

A Nursing Report That Deserves More Than The Usual Shrug

March 14, 2011

By Christine Moffa, MS, RN, AJN clinical editor

The IOM report The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health came out this past October, causing a flurry of excitement among some in the nursing world and groans of “big deal” among others. My immediate instinct was to shrug my shoulders and wonder if yet another report will really make a difference at the bedside.

AJN addressed the report and its implications in our December 2010 and February 2011 issues—so I knew it must be very important. But, for some reason, I had assumed it was going to be a dry, unreadable bore. And I put off reading it until recently, when I needed to use it as a reference. And wow, was I in for a surprise! I especially liked the inclusion of real case studies of nurses from different backgrounds and work experience who are making a difference in health care.

It’s inspirational, and I encourage all nurses out there—and anyone with a stake in health care (that’s pretty much everybody)—to take a look. (Tip: I found downloading the PDF version didn’t take long, and it was much easier to navigate than the HTML version.) If you’d like to hear more on the report and what it means to nurses, sign up for our upcoming Webcast about it. Let us know if you have any questions or comments, and we can try to address them in the discussion. Here’s the official promo info:

LWW Nurse Editors’ Roundtable – The Future of Nursing
Tuesday, March 22, 2011, at 12:00 pm EDT / 9:00 am PDT Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

When Patient Safety Trumps All: Conversations With the Texas Whistleblower Nurses

February 25, 2011
Map of USA with Texas highlighted

Image via Wikipedia

By Maureen Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

You may not remember February 11, 2010, all that well, but it’s a date nurse Anne Mitchell will never forget. It was the date she was acquitted of all criminal charges in a case that garnered widespread coverage not only in the nursing world (see our October 2009 report) but in the general media (see the New York Times article).  Mitchell was the Texas nurse criminally prosecuted for filing a complaint with the Texas Medical Board against a physician for unsafe and substandard practices (that board did agree with her). She and a colleague found themselves embroiled in a nightmare in which they were fired, arrested, and indicted. (Charges were eventually dismissed against Vicki Galle and only Mitchell went to trial.)

The case raised questions about a nurse’s professional and legal duty to safeguard patients—and about the strength of whistleblower protections (Texas has a whistleblower protection law).

In a “what goes around comes around” scenario, this past February those who pressed the charges—the sheriff (who was a patient, friend, and business partner of the physician); the Winkler County attorney; the former hospital administrator; and the physician—were all indicted by a grand jury. Ironically, the indictment was partially for misuse of official information, the same charge they had brought against the nurses.

On February 18, I interviewed Mitchell, Galle, and another colleague, Naomi Warren, who also wrote a letter of complaint accompanying their letter to the Texas Medical Board but wasn’t prosecuted. In the interview (you can listen to the two-part podcast on our Web site, on the podcast collection page called “Conversations.”) Their description of what this experience did to their lives is chilling. Even so, their commitment to their patients is unyielding, and they say they would make their complaint against the physician again without question.

I hope nursing faculty will highlight this case and these courageous nurses to their students.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Nurse Brings Photo Exhibit to U.S. Capitol

February 7, 2011

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN editor-in-chief

Kathleen Bartholomew, MN, RN, a consultant and speaker from the state of Washington, has made it her mission to enlighten policy makers and legislators about the important work of nursing. And she believes in the power of photographs to help her make her case.

From January 24 through January 28, Bartholomew hosted AJN’s award-winning photo exhibit, Faces of Caring: Nurses at Work, which was on display in the rotunda of the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C.  For two days of the previous week it was on display in the Rayburn House Office Building. Bartholomew had enlisted the help of her legislators, Congressman Rick Larsen and Senator Patty Murray, to get the necessary clearances and permissions for this unique location within the Senate building. While people viewed the exhibit, Bartholomew was available to speak with them about the vital work of nursing. She also visited senators’ offices and met with legislative aides.  

The photographs in the exhibit are the winners and selected honorees from an international photo contest that was first exhibited at New York University College of Nursing in New York City in 2007, with support from the Johnson & Johnson Campaign for Nursing’s Future, the Beatrice Renfield Foundation, and the Jonas Center for Nursing Excellence. Since then, the photographs have traveled to various cities throughout the U.S. as a vehicle to advance awareness of the vital role of nursing. To learn about sponsoring the exhibit, go here.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Neither Dragons nor Angels — Just Imperfect, Like Everybody Else

January 21, 2011

By Gail Pfeifer, MA, RN, AJN news director

I’m not a history buff, but my husband is. So I nicely went along on a recent trip with him to Virginia, visiting historic sites like Montpelier, Jamestown, Yorktown, and Appomattox. It was more fun than I’d anticipated and it really did open a door for me, showing me how much, and how little, has changed, especially in political behavior: When Cornwallis had to surrender to Washington, for example, he feigned illness and sent his second in command, General O’Hara, to do so. Washington, in return, would not accept the sword from O’Hara, directing him to his own second in command. Tit for tat.

Interior doorways, Clover Hill Tavern, Appomattox Court House

One of the things I least expected from the National Park Service was a specific acknowledgment of nurses or nursing (except for maybe Clara Barton, who established the American branch of the International Red Cross). Yet there it was at one of our Civil War site stops: a note that Dorothea Dix had visited to review care of the Union soldiers.

Although she is best known for her work improving care for the mentally ill, Dix became Superintendent of Female Nurses for the Union during the Civil War, serving for the entire duration without pay. At that time, biographers say (variably) that she was 59 or 60 years old, a strong, unmarried woman of her times. Dix was a social reformer and far from politically correct for her day. They called her “Dragon Dix” because of her outspoken opinions and her “autocratic” approach to choosing nurses who could serve under her aegis—no hoop skirts, no jewelry, and preferably plain looking and over 30. Despite her nickname, and perhaps (depending on how you view appropriate behavior in women) her flaws, you can find her described online, along with Barton, as an “Angel of the Battlefield.”

These polar-opposite labels tweaked my interest in nursing history and made me wonder: How far have we come as nurses in the eyes of those we serve, and how do these labels end up persisting over decades? Are we either dragons or angels, or will we finally be acknowledged as professionals with individual, imperfect personalities who work to improve health care? When new nurses look at nursing history 150 years from now, what doors will they see opened, by us, in 2011?

Bookmark and Share

h1

Nurses, Hospitals, and Social Media: It Depends What Business You’re In

January 19, 2011

By Julianna Paradisi, RN

Zuckerberg/via Flickr, World Economic Forum

Before the placenta picture posted on Facebook by a nursing student made national news, I read Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year 2010,” by Lev Grossman. Born in 1984, Mark Zuckerberg, the inventor of Facebook, is decades younger than the average working nurse. According to the article, so many people now belong to Facebook that if the Web site were a country “it would be the third largest, behind only China and India.” To refuse to recognize the social impact of Facebook is to miss the boat.

Throughout the nurse blogosphere, nurses are demanding that hospitals create policies about the use of social media. Some hospitals have. Not surprisingly, these documents state that no unauthorized photographs of staff, patients, or patient care areas should be taken, let alone posted on the Internet.

Hospitals with social media policies are not necessarily squelching their employees’ right to freedom of speech. They don’t want to spend time and money in court defending their public image. They already spend lots of money on marketing. They are in the business of patient care, not entertainment. So hospitals with social media polices take the position that you can post or tweet to your heart’s content, but should keep in mind the following:

  • Nothing you post is private.
  • If your online behavior disrupts patient care or creates hospital liability, the hospital reserves the right to fire you.

Consider your personal commitment to your own rights. Do you really want to catch every ball that’s thrown to you? Hospitals don’t want to spend their time and money on social media lawsuits. Do you?

Social media is not going away. One of Mark Zuckerberg’s profitable insights is that people like reading about and seeing their friends and friends of friends online. A few years ago, many of us were upset when the Patriot Act made it possible to force libraries and bookstores to report which books their patrons read. Now we want everyone to know what books we “like,” and no one seems to mind that Amazon tracks what we read, then focuses ads according to our purchases.

My own concept of privacy is changing. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

The Real Criminals Here: Justice is Served in Winkler County, Texas, Whistleblower Case

January 17, 2011
Map of USA with Texas highlighted

Image via Wikipedia

By Maureen ‘Shawn’ Kennedy, AJN editor in chief

On January 13, news from Texas let nurses everywhere take heart that, sometimes, the system works. According to a report by the Odessa American, the Winkler County, Texas, officials, Sheriff Robert Roberts and attorney Scott Tidwell, who had filed charges against whistleblower nurses Anne Mitchell and Vicki Galle, have been indicted on felony charges of misuse of official information. The hospital administrator who fired the two nurses, Stan Wiley, was also indicted. For more on the story, which we’ve kept a close eye on since October 2009 in our news reports and on this blog, see this ABC World News article; the Texas Nurses Association also has an archive of the case.

In a separate civil suit against the county, Mitchell and Galle were awarded $750,000. Very excellent.

Why is this so exciting and significant? The case outcome supports nurses who raise concerns about unsafe patient care and upholds the nurse’s right—duty, really—to advocate for patients. Hopefully, the nurses’ victory and the award from the civil suit will give pause to those who think they can intimidate nurses who are acting on good conscience and within legal and ethical boundaries.

Kudos to the courts for realizing who the real criminals are.

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 296 other followers