Archive for the ‘health care reform’ Category

h1

‘Problems Worthy of Attack’: Takeaways from IOM Summit on Nursing’s Future

December 6, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief

Last week, I spent two days at the summit convened by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to launch the Campaign for Action—the strategic plan to implement the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) report on the future of nursing.

The days were packed with presentations from key players in health care, who offered their perspectives for implementing the recommendations (plus lots of networking, hallway “sidebars,” animated dinner conversation, and commitments from individuals and organizations to continue the momentum). Here are some quotes and snippets of conversation that stick with me as I work on a more comprehensive report:

IOM president Harvey Fineberg, in his opening remarks: “It’s our turn to act to advance nursing and health.”

Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, opening the event: “We will remember that we were here on November 30 at the beginning of a new future for nursing.” And cautioning: “scope of practice is the hot button that could blow all this apart.” (A thought echoed by Jack Rowe, an IOM committee member, professor at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, and former CEO of Aetna, who used the term “combustible.”) Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

AJN Webnotes: Anatomizing Medical Errors; Insurance Rebates; Social Media and Nurses

November 22, 2010

The most popular article in last week’s New England Journal of Medicine did not tout the discovery of a novel gene, nor describe a cardiology clinical trial with a clever acronym as its title. Rather, it was the report of a case in which a surgeon at the Massachusetts General Hospital performed the wrong operation on a 65-year-old woman.

So begins a nicely engaging summary post at The Health Care Blog of the main points of an NEJM article describing how a medical error occurred—and yes, nurses play a major role in the story too. 

Feel like your insurance company spends too much time trying to weasel you out of your money? Kaiser Health News reports today that the Affordable Care Act may soon result in a little payback, in the form of rebates:

Millions of Americans might be eligible for rebates starting in 2012 under regulations released Monday detailing the health care law’s requirement that insurers spend at least 80 percent of their revenue on direct medical care.


“I have nothing listed under my work experience, yet Facebook somehow knows where I work,” cries Not Nurse Ratched, in a post called “Latest Facebook creepiness rant.” Such surprises are worth considering for anyone who might forget that information has a life of its own on the Web. Speaking of social media and nurses, A Nurse Practitioner’s View gives a quick survey of social media networking platforms available to nurse practitioners, then makes this important observation about participation:

It’s obvious that social (and professional) networking sites aren’t going anywhere anytime soon (FaceBook touts 500 million uses). However, there needs to be increased participation and discussion for them to be meaningful before people give up on them altogether – at least from a professional standpoint.

Which is a good lead in to this: please leave us a comment. We’d like to know what you think. Or yes, you can visit our Facebook page (click image above) and let us know your opinion there.—JM, senior editor/blog editor

Bookmark and Share

h1

Enough with the Scare Tactics: Some Follow-Up on the IOM Report on the Future of Nursing

October 21, 2010

flying pig/aturkus, via Flickr

Shawn Kennedy, AJN’s interim editor-in-chief, already posted here about the importance of the recently released Institute of Medicine Report on the Future of Nursing. Its implications are particularly profound at a time when we have a scarcity of primary care providers—and also at a time when the Affordable Care Act (i.e., health care reform) has designated more resources to nursing education and to generally making better use of nurses’ expertise. A number of bloggers have written about the IOM report, several of them expressing chagrin about the predictably naysaying American Medical Association response. Rebutting the AMA, the Center for Health Media and Policy at Hunter College had this to say. One working NP who weighed in on this topic is Stephen Ferrara, who noted (almost two weeks ago, in fact, though we missed it until now) the real world implications of the current situation for NPs in New York State, in a succinct post on his blog, A Nurse Practitioner’s View:

The bottom line is (at least in NY where I practice), without a collaborating physician on record, the 14,000 or so NPs are unemployed and can’t legally do anything that we were trained or educated to do. It is time to remove these non-evidence based barriers and retrospective reviews and allow us to function as true partners on the health care team. Collaboration among providers would still continue to happen and I promise pigs wouldn’t start to fly. Fourteen states have already transitioned to to an autonomous model of practice model for NPs. Lawmakers must not cave to special interests and make the tough decisions that will enable greater access to care.

Of course, the IOM report wasn’t just about letting nurses practice what they were trained to do. It also dealt with nursing education and a number of other related issues. And we’ll be covering its many implications in upcoming issues. In the meantime, we’d love to hear the perspectives of more working RNs and NPs. Are you happy with the role of nurses in the health care system, just as it is? If so, why? If not, why not?—JM, senior editor/blog editor

Bookmark and Share

h1

IOM Report: The Evidence Shows the Future of Health Care Rests on the Backs of Nurses

October 8, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief

This past Tuesday, I attended the release of the highly anticipated (at least by nursing) report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) on the future of nursing. Spearheaded and supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), the report provides a review of nursing’s role in health care and details what changes need to occur for the future—not just of nursing, but for the future health of the health care system.

While the findings support what nursing has been claiming all along—that nurses have a critical role in health care and the health care system needs nurses to practice to the full extent of their capability—what is especially important about this report is that it is backed by the IOM’s multidisciplinary panel and an “objective evaluation of evidence according to the robust evaluation processes of the National Academy of Sciences,” said John Rowe, a committee member and professor at Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University.

The panel at the public briefing for the release of the report included some health care heavyweights who voiced strong support for the findings:

Harvey V. Fineburg, president of the IOM: “One thing shouts out—nurses are critical to the nation’s health and central to the goals of high quality care.”

Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, president and CEO of the RWJF: “This is not a report about nursing but a report about a key missing piece to fixing health care; it establishes the centrality of nursing in providing safe, high quality, patient-centered care.”

Donna Shalala, president, University of Miami: “This report will usher in the golden age of nursing. Nursing has to be allowed to practice to the full extent of its scope of practice and to be a full partner with other professions in redesigning the U.S. health care system. It’s not about one profession substituting for another but about true collaboration.”

Later, in an interview I conducted with ANA CEO Marla Weston, she made a point of saying that allowing nurses to fully practice “isn’t just about NPs—nurses in all settings need to be allowed to practice according to their education and professional scope.  Nurses in institutional settings are often limited by bureaucratic policies and procedures.”

Prior reports by the IOM have spurred transformation of health care delivery—think of the 1999 report on medical errors, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, and how that initiated a focus on creating a culture of safety and brought about new standards for hospital safety. I’m hoping the same will happen now with this report.

What the MDs say. And I hope our professional colleagues will be open to the report’s findings, though I have some doubts. The American Medical Association issued a statement that, after initially noting that “health care professionals will need to continue to work together,” goes on to reveal that the AMA believes in  “a physician-led team approach to care—with each member of the team playing the role they are educated and trained to play.” Further, it says, “increasing the responsibility of nurses is not the answer to the physician shortage.”

In that they are correct—the report is not about nurses taking on the functions of physicians; it’s about nurses doing nursing and yes, some nursing and medical tasks and procedures are the same. Physicians need to change their entrenched way of thinking that they and only they know what’s best for patients (case in point: see “No Country for Old Women,” a recent blog post by AJN associate editor Amy Collins about her grandmother) and for health care. Otherwise, we will all fail those we purport to serve.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Nightingale, One More Time

September 2, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief

Florence Nightingale in the Crimean War (detail)

I know we’ve written a lot about Florence Nightingale on this blog recently (see Susan Hassmiller’s series of posts, In Florence’s Footsteps: Notes from a Journey) and I don’t want to put off those who aren’t necessarily fans, but I came across an editorial written by Gloria Donnelly, editor-in-chief of Holistic Nursing Practice, that resonated with me.  She writes about how the holistic nature of Nightingale’s approach fits with much that’s going on today in health care reform, citing as one example the trend toward teaching people to take charge of their own health. (The entire Fall issue highlights the work of holistic practitioners—I especially liked Garden Walking for Depression: A Research Report.)

Donnelly writes:

We believe that Ms. Nightingale, an advocate of health, self-healing, and healthy environments, would be proud of the strides that nurses have made to promote holistic health and care around the world. . . . Nightingale believed that ’health nursing‘ and cultivating good health were equally important to ’sick nursing,’ the art and principles of which she developed almost single-handedly. Prevention superceded cure in Nightingale’s schema as she advocated for Health Missioners to work, first in the villages of rural India and then in England, teaching women how to prevent disease and maintain healthy environments.

This, in a nutshell, describes nursing at its core. It’s a shame that of all of Nightingale’s philosophies and improvements that were adopted by health care systems around the world, “health nursing” wasn’t a primary one. Was it too simple a concept—was it assumed that people know (or should know) how to care for themselves? Or was it too difficult, since preventing disease often involves a wide spectrum of social changes, such as addressing poverty and improving education and access to care?

Lillian Wald, one of the founders of the Henry Street Settlement in New York City and of public health and school nursing, proved that “health nursing” works. The United Nations Millennium Development Goals are a present-day embodiment of this concept. Yet, while Donnelly’s editorial points to ways that some current trends in health care reflect Nightingale’s approach, most health care systems worldwide have pretty much ignored it in favor of “sick nursing.” How did health care get so far off track? Food for thought.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Still Confused About Health Care Reform? Welcome to the Club

August 5, 2010

By Peggy McDaniel, BSN, RN. Peggy is an infusion practice manager who occasionally writes for this blog.

I admit that I’ve been a bit overwhelmed with the ongoing discussions around health care reform. It sounds like I’m not the only one. FierceHealthcare.com recently reported that the results of a Harris Poll suggest many Americans remain befuddled about the implications of the Affordable Care Act passed in March:

“Here are some areas [w]here a general cluelessness among those polled prevailed:

  • 82 percent think the bill will result in rationing of healthcare or that it might (it won’t);
  • 79 percent don’t know or aren’t sure if drug companies will pay an annual fee (they will);
  • 73 percent don’t know the law establishes a new tax on the sale of medical devices;
  • 66 percent don’t know or aren’t sure if the legislation will result in insurance exchanges where people can shop for insurance (it will); and
  • 63 percent either aren’t sure or don’t know if the new law will increase the number of people elibible for Medicaid (it will).

The chairman of the Harris Poll is quoted in the article: “It seems people are still reacting to the rhetoric, not the substance of what is in the bill . . .”

By db*Photography/via Flick

Considering the results of this poll, what do you think it would take to get the public up to speed on the facts? Do Americans not care, or is it too overwhelming? As a nurse, I feel I should be more informed about the law. And I’m going to spend some more time studying up on this as it affects us—as health care providers as well as citizens. How do you feel about this and what do you think could be done to clear up the confusion?

(More details about the poll results can be found here.)

Bookmark and Share

h1

Ms. Nightingale as an Applied Statistician

July 20, 2010
By Sue Hassmiller, PhD, RN, FAAN (latest in a series of posts by Hassmiller, who’s spending her summer vacation retracing crucial steps in Florence Nightingale’s innovative career)
 
Here at the home of Florence Nightingale, Embley Park (for more on Embley Park, see last week’s blog post), approximately 100 people have convened to study the impact of the “Lady with the Lamp.” The lady herself was multifaceted, and so is this crowd of scholars. There are nurse leaders, of course, but also museum curators, historians, educators, and biographers. They are all interested in their own piece, but also in how their piece fits into the bigger whole of her life. Today we heard Professor Thomas from the University of Southampton School of Business discuss her contributions as an applied statistician.
   

Nightingale in Scutari ward/Library of Congress, via Wikimedia Commons

Representing mortality. Early in her life, Ms. Nightingale identified the need for hospitals and healthcare systems to collect and use data to improve care. She asked what use are statistics “if we don’t know what to make of them?” She is credited with developing the famous “coxcomb” illustration, which was a multidimensional way of depicting mortality rates. She used statistics at Scutari Hospital (also called Selimiye Barracks) in Turkey to guide her actions and used statistics and data in the London Times to convey the travesty of the Crimean War. 

Institutional and cultural barriers. But Nightingale didn’t just rely on data for getting more of what she needed for the soldiers—she also used storytelling . . . a lesson that’s not lost on me in terms of affecting policy today. However, and this is a big however, just as they do today, politics, context, and culture reigned supreme. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

Health Care Reform: What’s In It for Nurses?

July 2, 2010

By Bob Jagendorf/via Flickr

A relaxing and safe Fourth of July weekend from the AJN editors to all nurses in the U.S., whether you’re taking it easy or on the job!

A recent poll conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation shows rising popularity for the health care reform law. Many hard decisions still need to be made; innovation is more crucial than ever. Nurses who’d like a clearer sense of how the health care reform law may affect them in the coming years should have a look at “Health Care Reform: What’s In It for Nursing?” in our July edition. Written by AJN‘s emeritus editor-in-chief Diana Mason, it points out some of the new models of care the law promotes, models in which nurses play an increasingly important and vital role at every level. As often in the dynamic history of this country, there will be new kinds of opportunities for those who are ready for them.—JM, blog editor

Bookmark and Share

h1

ADA 70th Scientific Sessions: Reform Implications for Diabetes Care; Fighting Obesity in Middle School; Harnessing New Technology for Better Self-Management

June 29, 2010

By Jane Seley, NP, BC-ADM, CDE. Seley coordinates the Diabetes Under Control column in AJN and is a diabetes nurse practitioner at New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell.

By Mel B./via Flickr

I’m at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 70th Scientific Sessions, which takes place from June 25-June 29th in Orlando. The ADA Scientific Sessions is an important forum for diabetes researchers and clinicians from all over the world to present research findings, network, and share ideas.

There are over  17,000 health care professionals registered from all over the world, 700 speakers, 2000 research posters, and 175 device and pharmaceutical company exhibitors. Every year, new diabetes treatments and technologies are discussed and displayed. Some highlights of sessions so far:

1) Implications of U.S. health care reform on the care and prevention of diabetes: Health care reform has the potential to have a huge impact on the millions of people with prediabetes and diabetes who have inadequate or no insurance coverage. Many of our patients have to make difficult decisions around checking blood glucose and taking insulin because of the high cost of medications and supplies and poor reimbursement. People with diabetes can spend hundreds of dollars every month for medication and self-management supplies. Nurses need to be proactive in assisting patients in accessing all available resources and lobbying for better reimbursement for diabetes care.

2) Pancreas not to blame in gastric bypass–related hypoglycemia: Hypoglycemia that may occur post gastric bypass surgery was thought to be a result of abnormal pancreatic islet cells. A recent study found that the beta cells in the pancreas function properly postoperatively. The mechanism of post gastric bypass hypoglycemia remains a mystery. As nurses, we have to monitor our patients carefully postoperatively and make sure that diabetes medications are appropriately reduced if the insulin requirements dramatically decline.

Mega Hamburger/Marshall Astor, via Flickr

3) The symposium on “What influences what we eat?” by Amy Ozier, PhD, RD, an expert in eating disorders and obesity at Northern Illinois University, was well received. Dr Ozier is creator of the EADES (Eating & Appraisal Due to Emotions and Stress) Questionnaire. She discussed the psychological and physical factors that modulate how much we eat. Ozier uses the questionnaire to assess whether eating is a response to stress and emotions and examines coping mechanisms. When caring for a patient with hyperglycemia or a high A1c indicating poor glycemic control, we need to look at contributing factors such as overeating as well as what may be triggering the behavior. Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

What Lies Ahead? AACN Presidents Weigh In on Health Care Reform, Rapid Response Teams, and More

May 24, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief

Kristine Peterson & Beth Hammer, incoming and outgoing AACN presidents

On my last day at the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses’ annual meeting last week in Washington, DC, I had a chance to speak with both Beth Hammer, whose term as president ended with the meeting, and Kristine Peterson, the new president. Our conversation ranged from how they felt about being president of such a large nursing organization to their views on health care reform and how rapid response teams are affecting the work environment of critical care nurses. You can hear the conversation free on AJN’s Web site: go to the Podcasts tab and click on Conversations. Or just click here (the download may take a minute or two).

And don’t miss my first post from the exhibit hall floor at the meeting (the National Teaching Institute & Critical Care Exposition, or “the NTI”)  and my second post on a conversation with a critical care nurse about a bad staffing practice, which seems to have hit a nerve!

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 291 other followers