Archive for March, 2010

h1

In Long-Term Care, What’s Favoritism?

March 31, 2010

By Sheena Jones, an LPN who is in training to be an RN at Dutchess Community College, Poughkeepsie, NY

Birthday Cake/by Eggybird, via Flickr

Is it really fair when we get the favoritism speech from our superiors when we supply residents who have no family or friends with hygiene supplies? When there are two roommates and one has family and friends who visit daily and bring her all that she could need or want and the other has nothing and no one? Am I wrong for getting a couple of supplies from the dollar store for her? We all know that the hygiene supplies in many facilities are watered down and cheap. Am I wrong for buying someone some socks when they have none? We can’t share supplies or clothing between patients, so do I let someone walk around with nothing? If these people were my family or friends I would want someone to make them comfortable. They can’t leave the facility to go shopping with family or friends, and many of them have lost most of their mental capacity and have no one to help them—but that does not mean that they should walk around less put together than someone with a family? Do we just let these residents go without?

Bookmark and Share

h1

What Nurses Need to Know About Continuous Glucose Monitoring

March 30, 2010

Case 1. A 27-year-old man has had type 1 diabetes for 19 years. His hemoglobin AIc level prior to starting RT-CGM [real-time continuous glucose monitoring] was 9.4%. . . . Over the 15 months of RT-CGM use, he was able to decrease his hemoglobin AIc level to 7.7% and maintain it at that level for several months. After he stopped using RT-CGM because his insurance didn’t cover sensors, his hemoglobin AIc level rose to 8.5%. When he got a new job and was able to resume use of RT-CGM, after three months his hemoglobin AIc level had once again decreased, this time to 7.9%.

Case 2. A 10-year-old girl has had type 1 diabetes for almost three years. Her hemoglobin AIc level before starting RT-CGM was 9.8%. By five months after starting RT-CGM her hemoglobin AIc level had decreased to 7.2%. After discontinuing sensor use because of the high cost of RT-CGM supplies and a lack of insurance coverage, her hemoglobin AIc level rose to 8.2%.

The above are composite cases of patients with type 1 diabetes who used real-time continuous glucose monitoring devices as a tool to improve their blood sugar control. They’re from an article in the April issue of AJN that gives a balanced overview of this technology, including how it works, its current uses (as a diagnostic tool, a warning system for hypo- and hyperglycemia, and a way to improve long-term glycemic control), its coverage and costs—and its advantages and disadvantages, as described here:

The advantages of using a sensor include

* the availability of glucose values every few minutes.

* a possible reduction in the frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemia.

* tighter glycemic control and a possible decrease in long-term complications.

* a possible reduction in the frequency of finger-sticks.

The challenges to using a sensor are that

* it requires its own insertion site in the body, and the receiver must be within five to 10 feet of the transmitter, depending on the product, for glucose values to be detected.

* it often requires the patient to carry the receiver around, in addition to the other supplies. (Medtronic currently has a product on the market that’s both an insulin pump and CGM receiver in one unit, and Abbott’s CGM receiver also functions as a glucose meter. Other companies are also working on creating integrated products that deliver insulin and measure glucose values. Currently, two insertion sites, one for the insulin pump and one for the RT-CGM sensor electrode, are needed in the sensor-enhanced pump. Several companies are at work on combining insulin delivery and glucose measurement at a single injection site.)

* patients may need to actually do more frequent glucose testing.

* some patients will have difficulty understanding the difference between finger-stick glucose values and sensor values. There is a learning curve here

This technology is right for some, not so right for others. Nurses caring for people with diabetes will need to know more about it as it becomes more common.

Patients who decide to use RT-CGM devices may initially face frustration while getting used to the system, especially when adjusting to the differences that can occur in either direction between blood glucose and sensor values. Many will need encouragement from nurses. It’s nurses’ responsibility to give their patients the most updated information about the advantages and disadvantages of new tools that may help them better manage their diabetes.

We hope you’ll read the article, and let us know your experiences with continuous glucose monitoring, either as patients or nurses…or both.

Bookmark and Share

h1

‘What’s Not to Like?’ A British Nurse, Recently Treated for Cancer, Weighs In on U.S. Health Reform

March 26, 2010

Here’s a little perspective on health care reform in the U.S. from AJN’s contributing editor on international health. Jane Salvage, RGN, BA, MSc, HonLLD, FQNI, is a visiting professor at the Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King’s College, London, and recently spent a year on the Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery.

At 10 Downing Street

Just two weeks ago I learned I had a stage 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma—a cancer in the lining of my womb. In many other countries today, and in the UK until recent years, this would eventually have killed me. But here I am today, happily home after a hysterectomy, probably cancer-free, thanking my lucky stars and our British National Heath Service (NHS).

My life has been saved by an army of people, from nurses and doctors to lab assistants, many of whom I’ll never meet. All my high quality care was free at the point of delivery, efficiently funded from my taxes instead of boosting the profits of insurance officials or millionaire surgeons. And I am pleased that my taxes have also subsidized the care of the demented, impoverished old lady in a nearby bed, even though her hollering and howling kept us awake most of the night.

What’s not to like? A great deal, you’d think from the nonsense talked about our UK NHS during your U.S. health reform debates. Last September, visiting the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, I stayed at the same Washington, DC, hotel as a group of anti-reform protesters. They seemed full of hate, for the world as well as for President Obama, and their ignorant, implacable opposition astonished and scared me.

Just before I went into hospital earlier this week, I cheered at the news of the passing of Obama’s health care bill. By the time I came out less than 30 hours later, the Republicans were already busily trying to sabotage the reforms, as they will continue to do. Fellow nurses, don’t let them do it. Fight them all the way. You need all the help you can get—let us know what we can do.

And please don’t believe the lies told about the NHS on Fox News by minor right-wing British politicians who have zero credibility back here. To be sure, there’s plenty that needs fixing in our system, and we’re working on it. I’ve spent the past year on the Prime Minister’s Commission on the Future of Nursing and Midwifery in England, identifying problems but also widespread good practice. We suggested some ways forward in our final report, launched on March 2. Drafting this report and then unexpectedly becoming a patient myself—seeing things from the other side of the fence—has reminded me, in a humbling way, of the greatness of our NHS. For all its faults it remains a brilliant system, and you’d be hard put to find a British nurse, doctor, or patient who isn’t a staunch supporter.

If ‘socialist  health care’ means supporting your family and fellow citizens and ensuring no one dies of undetected cancer or bankrupts themselves having treatment, I’m all for it.

Bookmark and Share

h1

‘After Heart Surgery’: A Survivor’s Account in March’s ‘Art of Nursing’

March 26, 2010

by Sylvia Foley, AJN senior editor

Heartstudy by James P. Wells, via Flickr

“I am grateful for the two hours my heart / stopped,”  says the narrator of  “After Heart Surgery.” It’s an incredible, heart-stopping line.  The voice is that of someone who has literally returned from the dead. He tells the tale with lively wonder, pledging  “allegiance to each leaflet of my bicuspid valve.” And yet as he lies in the bed, “eyes open,” attending carefully to his own heartbeat, we sense his lingering fear, too.

Poet Richard Waring doesn’t flinch from difficult subjects and offers them to us with rare clarity. In an earlier poem,Oboe,” Waring wrote of a boy’s time on a locked ward and how music helped him find “the grammar of a new survival.” (For either poem, click on the link and then open the PDF.) Waring is also a senior layout artist at the New England Journal of Medicine; his poems have appeared in venues as varied as Chest and The Boston Globe. We’re honored to have his work in our pages.

If you’re a poet or a visual artist, we hope you’ll consider submitting to Art of Nursing. Read this blog post for details. Guidelines can be found here. Still have questions? Write to the Art of Nursing coordinator (me) at sylvia.foley@wolterskluwer.com.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Online Social Networks for Chronic Illness – Time for Providers to Take Them Seriously

March 25, 2010

For many people, social networks are a place for idle chatter about what they made for dinner or sharing cute pictures of their pets. But for people living with chronic diseases or disabilities, they play a more vital role.

“It’s really literally saved my life, just to be able to connect with other people,” said Sean Fogerty, 50, who has multiple sclerosis, is recovering from brain cancer and spends an hour and a half each night talking with other patients online.

That’s from an article in the technology section of today’s NY Times, which draws upon a report from the Pew Internet and American Life Foundation about how people with chronic illnesses are finding connection, support, and information in online social networks like DiabetesConnect.

Chronic illness can be isolating for many reasons: you often can’t explain a condition’s relentlessness and complexity to those around you; at the same time, you may be homebound or to some degree limited in the types of activities you can engage in.

Providers should be aware of such online networks and the role they play for patients. Patients get useful information about self-care, and they feel less alone—though some who study online social networks do caution against any sites where the mood is focused entirely on the negative. Good feelings and bad (like good information and bad) can both be infectious on the Web, as we’ve learned during recent political debates.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Is Nurse Jackie Good for What Ails You?

March 23, 2010

Season 2 of the Edie Falco series on Showtime kicked off yesterday evening. Two immediate observations in passing: Jackie’s lifestyle is starting to catch up with her (so the show may be unrealistic at times, but it’s not all fantasy) and the episode’s most significant representation of patient advocacy showed Jackie on the phone trying to get a patient insurance coverage (good timing, on the eve of Obama’s signing of the health insurance reform bill).

We posted on “Nurse Jackie” from different angles (skeptical, enthusiastic) back during season one. It’s just entertainment, say many people. Others resent the less than idealized depiction of a nurse. Others find a heroic figure in Jackie despite her bad behavior. Or because of it. And so it goes. But the show does seem to have staying power. Are you watching? Are you a nurse watching, and how does that feel?

Bookmark and Share

h1

Will Anyone Miss Accidents As ‘Preexisting Conditions’ and Other Insurance Doubletalk?

March 22, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief

It’s interesting to have a firsthand encounter pertinent to the HCR story that is consuming the headlines. Recently, my son had a fall and dislocated his shoulder. He knew what had happened because he did it as a freshman in high school, some 10 years ago while playing sports. So he went to an ER and had the shoulder popped back in, saw an orthopedist as recommended, and went for physical therapy—all covered by his insurance plan. But all his claims for reimbursement were denied. The reason the company gave: his dislocated shoulder was considered a ‘preexisting condition.’

After my husband peeled me off the ceiling, we approached this methodically—we gathered forms, wrote letters, requested letters from the hospital, the orthopedist, the physical therapists—and appealed the ruling. After a bit, we received a response saying that they’d reconsidered and would cover the injury according to policy.

This is not a terribly compelling or poignant case, but it’s an example of the “first deny all claims” approach of some companies. Yes, it was resolved on appeal fairly easily, but why did it need appealing in the first place? I can’t imagine what patients and families with chronic illness must go through in trying to get treatment covered.

If the only thing health reform does is to eliminate the unjust use of preexisting conditions to deny coverage, it will get rid of one of the most critical obstacles to access to care.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Might Health Care Reform Happen? And What Will It Mean for Nurses?

March 19, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, AJN editorial director/interim editor-in-chief

The final push towards the staircase.../ caspermoller, via Flickr

Sometime in the next few days, Congress may bring the health care reform issue to a final vote and even a resolution of sorts, though one never knows what new twists may occur before then. I can’t even imagine what will occupy the news if it really does pass. (Philandering professional athletes and pilfering politicians better beware as newspapers seek new headlines.) 

Many Americans are calling their legislators to tell them what they want and don’t want. At the same time, many remain confused by the complexity of the legislative process as well as the particulars of the legislation. The final push received a boost this week from projections by the Congressional Budget Office that the bill would cut the budget deficit by $1.2 trillion over the next two decades. 

As nurses, we need to be knowledgeable and concerned with how health care will shape up—we’ll be delivering it. For information on the current bills under consideration, here’s two accessible sources: the Washington Post has a comparison of what the already passed Senate bill and the reconciliation version under consideration by the House include; the New York Times provides a pdf of the House bill.

Here’s a short list of provisions related to nursing likely to be in a final bill (as we noted in a post back in December about a useful ANA chart comparing House and Senate bills at the time):

  • increased financial support for nursing recruitment and advanced education
  • increased funding for graduate education for nursing faculty
  • increased funding for education for students who will practice in underserved areas
  • establishment of a Public Health Workforce Corps
  • increased Medicare reimbursement rates for advanced practice nurses, including nurse–midwives
  • pilot programs to provide reimbursement under Medicare for nurse practitioners to create or lead “medical homes”
  • increased reimbursement to school-based health clinics under Medicaid

Bookmark and Share

h1

Word Games? ANA Says We’ve Already Got a National Nurse; Others Disagree

March 18, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief

On a new post at Homeland Voice, author Fiona Regina, MSN, RN, presents a rather critical discussion of the American Nurses Association’s opposition to the National Nurse initiative. She writes, “For heaven’s sake, it’s time for the ANA to get on board. The entire ANA organization would be better served by embracing motivated, politically active nurses willing to improve the health of our nation.” 

Regina offers several theories as to why the ANA might be taking the position (that is, aside from their stated reasons, one of which is that the U.S. Public Health Service already has a Chief Nursing Officer); what’s lacking in her piece, though, is any comment from the ANA to refute her charges or further elucidate their position. 

The ANA stance aside, the notion of a National Nurse keeps coming up and has support from many sectors. Diana Mason, AJN‘s editor-in-chief emeritus, argued for it here last September. More nurses should join the debate so that this issue can either move forward or be put to rest. What’s your opinion?
Bookmark and Share

h1

Workplace Violence Against Nurses — Neither Inevitable Nor Acceptable

March 17, 2010

I’ve read about hospital nurses dealing with violence at work, but I always told myself that was something that happened in the emergency room or the psych ward. In oncology, I reasoned, we have relationships with our patients, and I have always felt safe with them.

So begins a harrowing—and remarkably nonjudgmental— story of a really bad day at work, written by Theresa Brown, a nurse who blogs regularly for the NY Times. (AJN will be featuring a profile of Brown in the May issue.)

Unhappy coincidence: It so happens that AJN published a Viewpoint essay on workplace violence in the March issue. Here’s how it starts:

I was working in the ED one day when a patient looked up and threatened to kill me. Grabbing my hand, he squeezed it until I thought it would break. It took several staff members to restrain him and force him to let go. I’ll never forget how he looked into my eyes and smiled as I screamed in pain.

Some of my colleagues said I should file a police report; others told me to get used to this type of behavior and toughen up. I called the police, and although they took my statement, they wouldn’t arrest the patient because he hadn’t inflicted “serious bodily injury.”

Marco Musso/via Flickr

The author, Jessica Leigh, offers advice to those who have faced workplace violence as nurses, and makes several recommendations for influencing policies at your hospital or facility, as well as for pushing for legislation to make such violence against health care workers a serious crime.—Jacob Molyneux, senior editor

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 291 other followers