Archive for January, 2010

h1

Are We Trivializing Breast Cancer (and Demeaning Women) Even As We Raise Awareness?

January 18, 2010

Christine Moffa, MS, RN, clinical editor

I admit it. On January 7th my  Facebook status simply stated “Black.” Normally I’m not a joiner, but when I received a message from a FB friend that said the following, This is fun put just the color of your bra in your status and send an email to the girls only and see if the guys can figure it out, it’s to raise breast cancer awareness,” I only paused for a moment. While a small part of me wondered if it was legit, I changed my status and forwarded the message on to other friends.

It seemed cute and harmless enough—until today, when I came across Donna Trussell’s article at Politics Daily. Her arguments—in which she interrogated her own feelings (as an ovarian cancer survivor) about our culture’s seeming obsession with breast cancer awareness, and distinguished between feel-good awareness and real action—made a lot of sense to me. The whole thing reminds me of the April 2009 cover of AJN (image below) featuring a piece from the Artful Bras Project by the Quilters of South Carolina, also created to raise breast cancer awareness.

We received a lot of letters about that one, both positive and negative. Either way, it does get people talking. Is doing something as silly (and, to some, either sexist or demeaning) as this justified in the name of increasing awareness about a disease?

Bookmark and Share

h1

“They Call Us Doctor, and We Call Them By Their Names”

January 15, 2010

Just stumbled on a blog post written by a first-year resident who calls himself “Anonymous Doc.” He raises a good question about why nurses and doctors are referred to in such different ways:

I don’t think I’ve talked about this before, but the doctor/nurse divide is weird. One of my intern friends called me the other night and said there’s a nurse he likes, and in theory wants to ask her out, but doesn’t think he should. It would be awkward, he’s like her superior… he doesn’t feel comfortable doing anything. And maybe he’s right. But the whole dynamic is weird. They call us doctor, and we call them by their names– and sometimes not even. At one of the hospitals, there’s this strange custom where the nurses all go by Miss or Mister and their first names. So I’m Dr. Lastname and they’re Miss Jenny or Mister Steve. It’s bizarre. Miss Jenny sounds like a kindergarten teacher. Maybe. And some of the residents use these names when they talk about the nurses to each other, like– “did you give the order to Miss Amber?” “did you tell Miss Jeanette?” Are we children? I feel like we’re colleagues, and we should all just call each other by our first names. Like colleagues do. Patients can call us Dr. Whatever, but I don’t feel like I need the nurses to treat me like a superior, and I also don’t want to treat them like they’re my nursery school teacher.

By Jeff Lowe, via Flickr

This writer sounds like a pretty fair, sensible person. What’s your take: are nurses demeaned by the names used to refer to them in the hospital?

Bookmark and Share

h1

Web Crawl: Unprofessional Workplace Behavior Irks Nurses; APNs Seek Primary Care Rights; Whistleblowers on Trial; More

January 14, 2010

Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN interim editor-in-chief

I spend a lot of time checking various web sites for news or new information nurses need to know, for interesting items for blog posts or articles, or for trends that may be coming down the pike. Here’s some “food-for-thought” items I found in my recent web crawls:

On nursingworld.org, the American Nurses Association, in a recent poll, asked site visitors if they had been “a target of unprofessional behavior” in the workplace. A startling 82% of respondents said yes. While “unprofessional behavior” was not defined (when you think about it, it could be any number of things, ranging from gossip and practical jokes to bullying and unwanted sexual advances), the fact that so many people feel this way deserves further exploration. What about you? What have you seen on your unit that might fit this category of “unprofessional behavior”?

Vindy.com, an Ohio news outlet, reports that advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the state want more recognition and freedom to practice. According to the article, the Ohio Association of Advanced Practice Nurses (OAAPN) is seeking legislators to remove restrictions that prevent them from heading the medical home models of primary care. Currently, physicians must be the designated head of the medical home. (See our article on this.)  Jacalyn Golden of OAAPN said APNs “have proved themselves since they began providing primary care in 1965.” Amen.

Remember the “Sentosa Nurses,” the nurses from the Philippines who became embroiled in prosecution after they quit en masse from New York nursing homes in 2007?  (We reported on it then and in a follow-up last April when the criminal charges against them were dropped, as well as here on the blog.)  A Filipino Web site reports that the nurses have filed a civil suit against the nursing home company (which still has a civil suit against the nurses) and the Suffolk County, New York, district attorneys.

The Texas nurses who filed charges against a physician for unsafe practice weren’t as lucky – they face a criminal trial in February. Go to the Texas Nurses Association Web site for updates and to contribute to their defense fund.

Bookmark and Share

h1

AJN’s Top 10 Articles in 2009

January 13, 2010

So, what were the most highly viewed articles of 2009 on AJNonline?

Here’s our Top Ten list – check them out:

1. Sex and Violence in the Media Influence Teen Behavior – duh!

2. Recognizing Sepsis in the Adult Patient - every nurse should know what to look for

3. Bullying Among Nurses – sad reminder that we might be our own worst enemy

4. Leech Therapy – it may be disconcerting, but it works wonders

5. The Marketing of Osteoporosis – how they turned a risk factor into a disease

6. The Nursing Shortage - this problem’s not going away soon

7. Understanding and Managing Burn Pain: Part 1 - it’s still misunderstood . . . and undertreated

8. Infection Control: Whose Job Is It? - unsafe nursing practices, you say?

9. Staging Pressure Ulcers: What’s the Buzz in Wound Care? – definitions matter!

10. Do Rapid Response Teams Save Lives? – well, it sounded like a neat idea . . .

–Shawn Kennedy, AJN interim editor-in-chief
Bookmark and Share

h1

H1N1 Influenza Hasn’t Left Yet — And May Be Back

January 8, 2010

By Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, AJN editor-in-chief emeritus

At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) press briefing yesterday on pandemic H1N1 influenza, spokesperson Dr. Anne Schuchat noted that while H1N1 activity was down, the virus was still more prevalent than what is normally seen for influenza. Warning that people should still get immunized against it, she also noted, “We also saw an uptick in pneumonia or influenza deaths in this past week.  And that isn’t something that we necessarily see around the Christmas holiday.”

The CDC is worrying about a growing complacency among the public. To illustrate the need for continued vigilance and immunizations, she showed this graph (also reproduced below) mapping the deaths from the 1957 influenza activity. You’ll note there was an initial wave in fall 1957, followed by a lull in which deaths decreased, and then a resurgence in which the number of deaths peaked in March 1958, close to the level in the first wave.

Hit it while it’s down. According to Schuchat, the lull (where we currently are) “essentially gave the all-clear whistle in that [1957] December/January time period.” “They had vaccine,” she noted, “but they didn’t encourage its use.” For now, she said, the message is this: “The illness is down.  There’s plenty of vaccine.  It’s a key window of opportunity. We don’t want to repeat the story from 1957.”

Nuff said.

h1

Some Observations In Response to the NY Times Article on Palliative Sedation

January 7, 2010

By Judy Schwarz, PhD, RN*  


The NY Times article of 12/26/09 that described use of palliative sedation in hospice institutional settings provided helpful and clinically accurate informative—for the most part. These few notes are meant to address those issues raised by the article that may unduly alarm dying patients, their families, and their clinical caregivers.


1) 
There is a consensus among palliative care clinicians that “palliative sedation to unconsciousness” (a descriptive term that eliminates some of the visceral reaction elicited by use of the term “terminal sedation”) is an intervention used only when other therapies that do not compromise patient consciousness have failed and the patient continues to experience intolerable and intractable suffering that cannot otherwise be relieved.

2) Use of palliative sedation to unconsciousness has NOT been shown to cause a hastened death. Research showing that patients at the very end of life who receive palliative sedation do not die more quickly than patients who are not sedated has been published in such peer-reviewed journals as Annals of Oncology, Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Archives of Internal Medicine, and Palliative Medicine. (In response to the Times article, the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization has made available a bibliography of these articles.)

This intervention is generally only provided when patients are “imminently” dying (a condition the recognition of which requires experience and clinical judgment) and is distinct from ”respite sedation,” which is used when clinicians plan to awaken a patient from the unconscious state to determine if their suffering has been relieved. It would be clinically inappropriate to awaken a dying patient whose suffering was deemed intractable and intolerable to them.

3) The Times article mentions an article published by Billings and Block in 1996 in the Journal of Palliative Care (vol 12, pp 21-30), an article intended to highlight the inappropriate use of morphine drips that were ordered by some physicians with the intention of causing a merciful death. These two very skilled and experienced palliative care clinicians were attempting to highlight the difference between the appropriate use of palliative sedation, in which the infusion of opiate and sedative is titrated and set to relieve suffering and cause unconsciousness, and “hanging a morphine drip,” in which the infusion rate is continuously increased in order to cause obtundation, respiratory depression, and death.

4) Finally, the one issue that was not addressed in this generally excellent article was the difficulties faced by dying, suffering patients whose symptoms merit use of palliative sedation to unconsciousness but who want to be able to die at home. In my experience, most hospices are unable or unwilling to provide this intervention to suffering patients who want to die comfortably and peacefully in their own homes.

*Schwarz, the author of “Stopping Eating and Drinking,” published in the September 2009 issue of AJN, is a regional clinical coordinator at Compassion and Choices, a nonprofit end-of-life advocacy and consultative organization.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Nurses Express Concerns About Colleagues’ Commitment, Training

January 6, 2010

Back in November AJN clinical editor Christine Moffa posted a short anecdote. She told how she’d been at a training to give H1N1 vaccinations and encountered another nurse with apparent contempt for learning the basic facts about the virus. While it’s obvious that you can’t generalize about the state of an entire profession based on one stranger’s off-the-cuff comment, the responses to this post do indicate that the anecdote touched a nerve in some readers and that other nurses have also had similar experiences with their colleagues. Here are some brief excerpts from longer comments:

From Naomi: “If I fail a class by 1 point and go to the director of my nursing program demonstrating my professionalism, critical thinking, and self responsibility i would get a pat on the back and a registrar’s form in the hopes that I could repeat the class if there are enough seats. My 3.8 GPA allowed me gain admission into my nursing program not my professionalism, critical thinking, and self-responsibility even though those are key qualities for a good nurse.”

From Nursevon: “I am a faculty member in an undergraduate BSN program at a university in the midwest. I have become increasingly discouraged in my job as an educator. The focus of students is very short-sighted: typically on points and grades. As hard as I try to instill professionalism, critical thinking, and self-responsibility for one’s own learning, I frequently come away profoundly discouraged.”

From Richard Crosby: “Hearing a new nurse explain a drug or a procedure to a family member is enough to make you ask when did they start teaching bad information in nursing school. Pathophysiology has been replaced with “leadership” training.”

From Judy: “One thing I say is, always stay humble, then you will learn. I have found nurses have too big of an ego to learn more….”

From Tabitha: “Frankly, it is my belief that students and new nurses alike have learned this culture of apathy and disengagement from practicing nurses. These behaviors, in my estimation, are symptoms of a much more malignant problem and that is burnout. Research supports that burnout is contagious (Bakker et al., 2005) and unless we advocate for reform in the nursing practice environment, the professionalism in nursing practice will continue to suffer. Many of you know new and old nurses alike who also roll their eyes at many of the innovative quality initiatives being pushed out in mass quantities by IHI, TJC, NDNQI, and CMS. What they represent for RNs is yet another unfunded mandate that nurses will have to fulfill during the course of an already jam-packed shift and the folks who end up suffering are our patients. We barely have time to fill out all the documentation required, much less place our stethoscope on our patient’s chest.”

From Marie: “I’ve recently come across a very interesting advertisement in ADVANCE FOR NURSES, (PENNSYLVANIA EDITION OF OCT 26, 2009 page 16), entitled “On the pulse of Learning”. The offering is from the University of Dundee’s distance nursing (RN-BN) degree program. It states that it is the “FIRST BRITISH nursing educational degree to be awarded NLNAC accreditation in the USA!” There are “NO CLINICALS or EXAMS, NO CLASSES – study at home. NO MATH/NO SCIENCE. ALL RNs welcome.” These programs are “delivered entirely by distance education”. Has no one noticed that this is the manner in which we are now educating professional nurses? As a former nursing instructor at the “traditional” university level I would not, in good conscience, have been able to allow my nursing students to progress to the next level without a full knowledge and understanding of the math and science related to their current level of nursing.”

Forgive us for ripping these quotes out of their longer contexts. There are some strong observations here, and we hope others will let us know their thoughts as well.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Home Care Nursing Isn’t for the Faint of Heart

January 5, 2010


The convalescent-home referral said that Loretta was 71 years old with the usual health problems related to stroke and diabetes. It also said that her husband had a gun and “wasn’t afraid to use it.” Fiercely protective of his wife, he’d had many disputes with the nursing staff about her care. The discharge planner who’d referred her to our home care agency insisted that two nurses make the initial home visit.

Read the rest of “The Dirtiest House in Town,” the Reflections essay in the January issue of AJN, here. And let us know your own experiences in home care nursing.

Bookmark and Share

h1

Lab Coats vs. Scrubs: Do the Clothes Make the Nurse?

January 4, 2010

By Jay Swanson, BSN, RN, OCN

Within a nurse’s career there are many opportunities for advancement, new jobs, or a change in shift. Most startling is the move from “working the floor” to “desk job.” When I left the floor to work in a job more focused on patient education, I was treated differently. I had worked on the same unit for five years; I was an informal leader on the floor and the chairperson of the floor management council, an elected position. I am not saying that I was well liked, but I was at least trusted.

During the first few months in the new job I felt that the coworkers I had known and worked alongside wouldn’t talk to me or look at me. Had I sold out? Was I less of a nurse?

It’s true, I no longer work 12-hour shifts, or weekends or holidays. I spend most of my time gathering resources and providing educational support for our oncology patients, and I get to leave work more or less when I want (usually after 5 pm).

Yes, all that’s true . . . but what I really blame is the lab coat. I believe the lab coat suddenly put me in a different category from those who wore scrubs. How do I know? When I did wear scrubs to work one day, I was treated differently, as if all of a sudden I was “one of them” again.

So what is it about the coat? Too close to physicians or other mid-level types? Most of them now wear scrubs at my facility. So then, what is it?

(Editor’s note: Swanson, a cancer nurse navigator at a facility in Nebraska, is also the author of the Reflections essay, “Read Your Card, Mary Sue,” in the November issue of AJN.)

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 258 other followers