Archive for December, 2009

h1

Secrets to Staying Safe and Sane on the Night Shift

December 9, 2009

by Ctd 2005, via Flickr Creative Commons

Shawn Kennedy, MA, RN, interim editor-in-chief

I recently sent my sister Jean, who works as a night nurse, an article called “Six Ways to Make Working the Night Shift Less Hazardous to Your Health.” The article noted recent research suggesting that shift work could increase your risk of everything from depression to obesity to cardiovascular disease. It also made a few simple suggestions: be consistent, nap before you work, don’t use caffeine (!!!), don’t take melatonin, change your lights, and eat a healthful diet. Here’s what my sister had to say about the article:

Yes, I do agree with the article. I am a night nurse and I always feel like I can’t get enough sleep. The days  I am off I tend to sleep too much. I have also suffered from depression and am on Cymbalta. The best way I found to cope is to try to maintain a “night” routine even when I am off. I go to bed at 2 am or 3 am and sleep until 11 am.  I also do not eat a lot on nights. At  work, I try to eat by 9 pm, and then if I am hungry I will have cereal or fruit. The nights I am off, we eat dinner at 7 pm. My house is quiet during the day as my children are older. If it is the weekend I sometimes wear ear plugs. I keep my bedroom dark. I sometimes take an Ambien to sleep if I work back to back. I do believe it takes a serious toll on my health and sometimes I think about going to days, but I feel the stress would be about 10 times worse.  I’d rather work in a more quiet and peaceful environment. I am 54, so hopefully I can retire in six years.

Thanks, Jean, for letting me quote you in this post. It makes me wonder: Do other night nurses feel this way? What does motivate someone to work full-time when the rest of the world is sleeping? Does it take a unique personality? Do you have a secret that might help others?

Bookmark and Share

h1

New National Nurses Union Forms — But What’s It Mean to You?

December 8, 2009

By Peggy McDaniel, BSN, RN

Yesterday a new and powerful union was formed. The National Nurses United brings over 150,000 nurses together by combining the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee with the Massachusetts Nursing Association and some members of the United American Nurses.  The new “superunion” intends to focus both on influencing health care reform and on improving quality of care through such efforts as extending California’s patient ratio law into other states.

I have never worked in a union-supported hospital, nor have I ever belonged to a union. My father was an electrical engineer and although he was a union member, he always talked about the “union guys” who worked as little as possible. I remember his frustration at members who took advantage of the positive conditions promoted by unions. When I was a newly employed nursing graduate, one of my friends was a card-carrying pipefitter. He bragged about not doing any work for days on end because there were no laborers around to carry his materials! 

As a hardworking staff nurse, I was angered by his complacency. I couldn’t imagine not clearing away a patient tray if the nurse’s aide hadn’t had time. I approached my nursing role as a team member focused on taking care of the patients—sometimes to my own detriment, since I was one of “those” nurses who often skipped breaks to complete tasks or charting. That said, I have seen the good that unions have done for nursing, especially around working conditions and benefits.

Given the current push to reform health care, this new union could make a difference for both nurses and our patients. As a nurse now focused on quality improvement, I would like to see nursing unions bring out the best in nurses by promoting compliance to evidence-based best practices and supporting professional development. There is now evidence to support IV therapy teams in hospitals and appropriate staffing ratios.  Since the evidence is there, let’s push to make these a reality in a majority of hospitals instead of only a few. At the same time, let’s hold our fellow professionals accountable to provide safe care 100% of the time, down to the idea that hand hygiene is not optional. 

Are you part of a union? Do you have a story to tell about being a union member? What do you think this new union could do to promote the state of nursing and what part should it play in our current health care reform process?

Bookmark and Share

h1

ANA Chart Compares Key Nursing Provisions in House and Senate Bills

December 4, 2009

By Judith Leavitt, MEd, RN, FAAN

There’s a tremendous amount of information available about the different congressional proposals on health reform. But it’s difficult to know how the proposed legislation might affect nurses and the profession. The American Nurses Association has just released an excellent chart offering side-by-side comparison of key provisions related to nursing in the two current bills, the House bill (H.R. 3962) and the Senate bill (H.R. 3590). These provisions include:

  • increased financial support for nursing recruitment and advanced education
  • increased funding for graduate education for nursing faculty
  • increased funding for education for students who will practice in underserved areas
  • establishment of a Public Health Workforce Corps
  • increased Medicare reimbursement rates for advanced practice nurses, including nurse–midwives
  • pilot programs to provide reimbursement under Medicare for nurse practitioners to create or lead “medical homes”
  • increased reimbursement to school-based health clinics under Medicaid

There’s much more to be gleaned here, and the chart format makes scanning for particular points of interest easy. Have a look!

Bookmark and Share

h1

On Lobbyists, Lotteries, Nurses, and Health Care Reform

December 3, 2009

By Peggy McDaniel, BSN, RN

I read the recent post on this blog about lobbyists and reform. Does this situation bother anyone else but me? Kaiser Health News reports that $422 million was spent from January to September of this year on lobbyists. Numerous groups—in fact, over 1,000—have put money towards shaping the legislation focused on health care reform. A great deal of money is also being spent to mold the messages you hear about the health care bills. 

by pinkmoose, via Flickr (creative commons)

It’s intriguing to note the different groups trying to influence the process, from Catholic bishops to big pharma. All want to have a stake in the outcome—some from a financial perspective, some from a moral stance. As nurses, we should have something to say about health care and insurance reform. Theresa Brown, one of my favorite bloggers, recently wrote that our current system is like a “lottery”—and used a very dark story to make her point. 

I happen to agree with her: our current market-based system works, until it doesn’t.

I have been at the bedside of patients who came up with the short straw, as I have previously shared here.     

Another post noted that domestic violence is considered a “pre-existing condition” and can be used to deny coverage. Our present health care system is unacceptable, but what can we do about it?  Rules preventing paid lobbyists from playing dominant roles in shaping legislation would be a good starting point.

A recent article in the Washington Post revealed that paid lobbyists will be banned by the Obama administration from holding seats on federal advisory panels. This was announced without fanfare but is an exciting step in the right direction. When people are paid to have a point of view and are also influencing government policy it is nothing less than corrupt. That said, lobbying as a concerned citizen for what you believe in and what you want to see happen in our government is not only a right, it’s a responsibility. Let’s promote an agenda that we can stand behind as individuals and as nurses.

Bookmark and Share

h1

National Forum to Focus on Role of Nursing in Community, Public Health, Primary Care, and Long-Term Care Settings

December 2, 2009


Below is a press release we received for an important and timely December 3rd event on the future of nursing, including links to attend the forum by live Webcast or to follow it on Twitter.

Initiative Exploring the Future of Nursing Convenes National Forum in Philadelphia

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine (www.iom.edu/nursing) will hold the second of three national forums on December 3 in Philadelphia. Participants including committee chair Donna Shalala discuss how to improve the delivery of medical treatment for Americans in Community Health, Public Health, Primary Care, and Long-Term Care settings across the country. This forum will look at opportunities in which nurses – who are key front-line providers of care – can play a role in ensuring patients in all settings receive the best possible care.

**A live webcast of the meeting will be available via www.thefutureofnursing.org**

**Follow the forum live on Twitter at http://twitter.com/FutureofNursing**

Read the rest of this entry ?

h1

‘Who Do You Trust?’ asks ANA President Patton in White House Video

December 1, 2009

As the Senate debates health care reform legislation, lobbyists across the political spectrum are busy trying to make themselves heard both by legislators and the American public. In an attempt to blunt the impact of the numerous campaigns aimed at killing or gutting the legislation, the White House has released a video called “Who Do You Trust?”, in which Rebecca Patton, president of the American Nurses Association (ANA), appears with Joe Biden and Lori Heim, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

But questions do remain. Despite the obvious need for many of the insurance reforms proposed in the plan, the Democrats have yet to fully address the question of how this will be paid for by real changes in the delivery of care or real limits on the influence of pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers.

How, for example, can cost controls ever occur in a system dominated by a fee-for-service model in which physicians’ income is often directly related to the numbers of tests and procedures they recommend, one in which they are rarely bound or directed by evidence-based guidelines or protocols? Would physicians’ organizations like the one represented in the White House video ever support a plan in which most physicians were, like most nurses, on salary? Why is that unthinkable?

Bookmark and Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 291 other followers